Author:
Norman Rebecka Maria,Jelin Elma,Bjertnaes Oyvind
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patient experience is an important indicator of the quality of healthcare. Patients with multimorbidity often face adverse health outcomes and increased healthcare utilisation. General practitioners play a crucial role in managing these patients. The main aim of our study was to perform an in-depth assessment of differences in patient-reported experience with general practice between patients living with chronic conditions and multimorbidity, and those with no chronic conditions.
Methods
We performed secondary analyses of a national survey of patient experience with general practice in 2021 (response rate 41.9%, n = 7,912). We described the characteristics of all survey respondents with no, one, two, and three or more self-reported chronic conditions. We assessed patient experience using four scales from the Norwegian patient experience with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP). These scales were used as dependent variables in bivariate and multivariate analyses and for testing the measurement model, including confirmatory factor analysis and a multigroup CFA to assess measurement invariance. Sentiment and content analysis of free-text comments was also performed.
Results
Patients with chronic conditions consistently reported lower scores on the GP and GP practice experience scales, compared to those without chronic conditions. This pattern persisted even after adjustment for patient background variables. The strongest associations were found for the scale of “Enablement”, followed by the scales of “GP” and “Practice”. The subscale “Accessibility” did not correlate statistically significantly with any number of chronic conditions. The analysis of free-text comments echoed the quantitative results. Patients with multimorbidity stressed the importance of time spent on consultations, meeting the same GP, follow-up and relationship more often than patients with no chronic conditions. Our study also confirmed measurement invariance across patients with no chronic conditions and patients with multimorbidity, indicating that the observed differences in patient experience were a result of true differences, rather than artifacts of measurement bias.
Conclusions
The findings highlight the need for the healthcare system to provide customised support for patients with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Addressing the specific needs of patients with multimorbidity is a critical step towards enhancing patient experience and the quality of care in general practice.
Funder
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Folkehelserapportens temautgave 2022. Framtidens utfordringer for folkehelsen. Sykdomsbyrde, bruk av helse- og omsorgstjenester, og smittsomme sykdommer [Public Health Report’s Special Edition 2022. Future Challenges for Public Health. Disease Burden, Use of Health and Care Services, and infectious diseases]. Oslo: Folkehelseinstituttet; 2022.
2. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Chapter 3: health status - chronic conditions health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators; 2021.
3. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Lapointe L. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Annals Family Med. 2005;3(3):223–8. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.272.
4. Buntinx F, Knottnerus A. Comorbidity or multimorbidity: what’s in a name? A review of literature. Eur J Gen Pract. 1996;2(2):65–70. https://doi.org/10.3109/13814789609162146.
5. Nunes BP, Flores TR, Mielke GI, Thumé E, Facchini LA. Multimorbidity and mortality in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;67:130–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2016.07.008.