Author:
Pourshahri Erfan,Mohammadi Fateme,Shareinia Habib,Abadi Fozieh,Bijani Mostafa
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Ethical decision-making in end-of-life care is one of the most challenging aspects of healthcare: providing ethical care to the society is one of the most important responsibilities of healthcare professionals. In order to assess nurses’ ethical decision-making in end-of-life care, researchers need a specialized and comprehensive instrument which is sufficiently valid and reliable. The present study was conducted to translate and test the psychometric properties of the Persian version of Nurses’ Ethical Decision-Making in End-of-Life Care Scale (NEDM-EOLCS).
Methods
This is a cross-sectional, multi-centric study with a methodological design The participants were selected via convenience sampling from five hospitals located in Iran. In total, 1320 nurses (660 for exploratory factor analysis and 660 for confirmatory factor analysis) participated in the study. The original NEDM-EOLCS was translated into Persian and subsequently the psychometric properties of the scale were assessed according to COSMIN criteria.
Results
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed the factor loading of the 55 items to be between 0.62 and 0.88, all of which were significant. Also, exploratory factor analysis showed that 3 factors (perceived professional accountability, moral reasoning/moral agency and moral practice) explained 74.51% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results verified the good fit of the data (a chi-square of 21.74, df = 7, P = 0.001) RMSEA = 0.01, CFI = 0.96, NFI = 0.95, and TLI = 0.97). The reliability of the scale was measured in terms of its internal consistency and the Cronbach’s alpha of the whole instrument was found to be 0.98.
Conclusion
The Persian version of NEDM-EOLCS for nurses is sufficiently valid and reliable. Thus, this instrument can be used to measure nurses’ ethical decision-making in end-of-life care and identify the most effective strategies, e.g. educational interventions, to improve ethical decision-making skills in end-of-life care in these healthcare professionals as necessary.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Benkel I, Arnby M, Molander U. Living with a chronic disease: a quantitative study of the views of patients with a chronic disease on the change in their life situation. SAGE Open Med. 2020;8:2050312120910350.
2. Khanali-Mojen L, Akbari ME, Ashrafizadeh H, et al. Caregivers’ knowledge of and attitude towards palliative care in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022;23(11):3743–51. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.11.3743.
3. Mobasher M, Aramesh K, Zahedi F, Nakhaee N, Tahmasebi M, Larijani B. End-of-life care ethical decision-making: Shiite scholars’ views. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2014;7:2.
4. Organization WH. Palliative care. WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care. Cited 2023 1.18.
5. Kim S, Lee WH. An integrative review of do-not-resuscitate decisions in Korea. J Med Ethics Educ. 2011;14(2):171–84. https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.