Author:
Ikonen Jenni N.,Törmäkangas Timo,von Bonsdorff Mikaela B.,Mikkola Tuija M.,Eriksson Johan G.,Haapanen Markus J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Sex-specific physical and mental functioning trajectory classification could offer a way of understanding the differences in healthcare use at older age.
Methods
Using latent growth mixture models, sex-specific physical and mental functioning trajectory classes were formed for 1991 participants (mean age 61.5 years) of the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study. Physical and mental functioning were evaluated with the SF-36 survey conducted in clinical examinations in 2001–2004, 2011–2013, and 2017–2018. First and follow-up outpatient visits, emergency visits, and hospital days were extracted from a national register between the first clinical examination and the year 2017. We used regression models to examine the associations between healthcare use and trajectory classes.
Results
Two physical and mental functioning trajectory classes, high and intermediate, were observed for both sexes. The intermediate physical functioning trajectory class was associated with higher utilization rates of all examined specialized healthcare services (fully-adjusted IRRs varying 1.36–1.58; 95% CI = 1.03–1.79, 95% CI = 1.21–2.05) compared to the high trajectory class. Relative to the high trajectory class, the intermediate mental trajectory class was associated with the use of first outpatient visits (fully-adjusted IRRs 1.17, 95% CI = 1.03–1.33 for men, and 1.16, 95% CI = 1.04–1.30 for women). The findings were similar among both sexes.
Conclusions
Compared to the high trajectory class, the intermediate physical functioning trajectory class was associated with greater specialized healthcare use and the intermediate mental trajectory class with first outpatient visits. Public health interventions should be considered to support functioning with aging.
Funder
University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Reference40 articles.
1. OECD. Health at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/4dd50c09-en.
2. World Health Organization. Decade of healthy ageing: baseline report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017900. Accessed 14 Jun 2023.
3. Han L, Allore H, Murphy T, Gill T, Peduzzi P, Lin H. Dynamics of functional aging based on latent-class trajectories of activities of daily living. Ann Epidemiol. 2013;23:87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANNEPIDEM.2012.11.010.
4. Liang J, Xu X, Bennett JM, Ye W, Quiñones AR. Ethnicity and changing functional health in middle and late life: a person-centered approach. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010;65B:470. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONB/GBP114.
5. Carey EC, Walter LC, Lindquist K, Covinsky KE. Development and validation of a functional morbidity index to predict mortality in community-dwelling elders. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1525-1497.2004.40016.X.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献