Author:
Sunkersing David,Martin Finbarr C.,Sullivan Paul,Bell Derek
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Evidence suggests that successful assessment and care for frail individuals requires integrated and collaborative care and support across and within settings. Understanding the care and support networks of a frail individual could therefore prove useful in understanding need and designing support. This study explored the care and support networks of community-dwelling older people accessing a falls prevention service as a marker of likely frailty, by describing and comparing the individuals’ networks as perceived by themselves and as perceived by healthcare providers involved in their care.
Methods
A convenience sample of 16 patients and 16 associated healthcare professionals were recruited from a community-based NHS ‘Falls Group’ programme within North-West London. Individual (i.e., one on one) semi-structured interviews were conducted to establish an individual’s perceived network. Principles of quantitative social network analysis (SNA) helped identify the structural characteristics of the networks; qualitative SNA and a thematic analysis aided data interpretation.
Results
All reported care and support networks showed a high contribution level from family and friends and healthcare professionals. In patient-reported networks, ‘contribution level’ was often related to the ‘frequency’ and ‘helpfulness’ of interaction. In healthcare professional reported networks, the reported frequency of interaction as detailed in patient records was used to ascertain ‘contribution level’.
Conclusion
This study emphasises the importance of the role of informal carers and friends along with healthcare professionals in the care of individuals living with frailty. There was congruence in the makeup of ‘patient’ and ‘provider’ reported networks, but more prominence of helper/carers in patients’ reports. These findings also highlight the multidisciplinary makeup of a care and support network, which could be targeted by healthcare professionals to support the care of frail individuals.
Funder
National Institute for Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Reference61 articles.
1. Xue Q. The frailty syndrome: definition and natural history. Clin Geriatr Med. 2011;27(1):1–15.
2. Kojima G, Liljas A, Iliffe S. Frailty syndrome: implications and challenges for health care policy. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019;12:23–30.
3. Lv J, Li R, Yuan L, Yang X, Wang Y, Ye Z, et al. Research on the frailty status and adverse outcomes of elderly patients with multimorbidity. BMC Geriatrics. 2022;22(1):1–8.
4. House of Commons. Adult Social Care Funding (England) - House of Commons Library. [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-7903/. Accessed Apr 2021.
5. Health Education England, NHS England and Skills for Health. Frailty A framework of core capabilities. Skillsforhealth.org.uk. [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.skillsforhealth.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Frailty-framework.pdf. Accessed Aug 2022.