Author:
Köner Özge,Şimşek Mustafa Aytek,Kızılcık Nurcan,Koca Çiğdem,Cabbar Ayça Türer
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction has a significant impact on perioperative morbidity and mortality, and its incidence is high in elderly individuals. Anesthetic agents may impair diastolic function, which may increase the incidence of perioperative complications. The aim of this prospective, clinical, phase 4 study was to investigate the effects of remifentanil on left ventricle (LV) diastolic function in patients with diastolic dysfunction. The study was performed on 30 spontaneously breathing subjects (aged 60–80 years) with diastolic dysfunction.
Methods
Thirty patients (aged 60–80 years) with diastolic dysfunction scheduled for surgery were recruited between November 2019 and March 2023. Left ventricle function was evaluated once the intravenous remifentanil infusion reached a target-controlled concentration of 2 ng/ml with transthoracic echocardiography. Analysis of systolic function focused on left ventricular ejection fraction and mean mitral annular S velocity (Sm), whereas diastolic function focused on changes in transmitral peak flow (E), E/A, mitral septal and lateral e’ waves, E/e’ ratios and left atrial volume index following remifentanil infusion.
Results
Diastolic function measures of LV (mitral E/e’, septal and lateral e’ waves) statistically significantly improved (E/e’ from 10.6 ± 2.9 cm.sn− 1 to 9.5 ± 2.2 cm.sn− 1; p = 0.006) following remifentanil infusion. Left atrial volume index decreased following remifentanil infusion without statistical significance (from 55 ± 14.4 ml.cm− 2 to 51.6 ± 13.3 ml.cm− 2; p = 0.1). Systolic function (ejection fraction and Sm) did not change following remifentanil infusion.
Conclusions
Remifentanil improves left ventricular diastolic parameters in patients with preexisting diastolic dysfunction. Our study suggests that remifentanil at a plasma concentration of 2 ng.ml− 1 might be used safely in patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Jhaveri R, Joshi P, Batenhorst R, Baughman V, Glass PS. Dose comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil for loss of consciousness. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:253–9.
2. Elliott P, O’Hare R, Bill KM, Phillips AS, Gibson FM, Mirakhur RK. Severe cardiovascular depression with remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:58–61.
3. Hoymork SC, Raeder J, Grimsmo B, Steen PA. Bispectral index, serum drug concentrations and emergence associated with individually adjusted target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:773–80.
4. Kazmaier S, Hanekop GG, Buhre WA, Weyland TB, Radke OC, Zoelffel R, Sonntag H. Myocardial consequences of remifentanil in patients with coronary artery disease. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84:578–83.
5. Sebel PS, Hoke JF, Westmoreland C, Hug CC Jr, Muir KT, Szlam F. Histamine concentrations and hemodynamic responses after remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 1995;80:990–3.