Author:
Tian Ye,Zhan Yong,Liu Ke,Bu Shaojin,Tian Yalin,Xiong Chunyan,Shen Jintao
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To explore the analgesic effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine in transversalis fascia plane (TFP) block during laparotomy.
Methods
Ninety patients who underwent laparotomy admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to March 2020 were selected as the study subjects and were divided equally into a low concentration group, a medium concentration group, and a high concentration group according to the randomized grouping method. The low concentration group adopted 0.4% ropivacaine 40 ml, the medium concentration group was given 0.5% ropivacaine 40 ml, and the high concentration group was given 0.6% ropivacaine 40 ml. The hemodynamic indexes and the incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups were compared. The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was used to assess the postoperative pain in the three groups, the Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) was used to assess the comfort level in the three groups, and the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to evaluate the postoperative cognitive function of the three groups of patients.
Results
The mean artery pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) levels at T1 and T2 were significantly lower in the medium concentration group than in the other two groups (P < 0.05). The low concentration group had a significantly higher NRS score at T2 than the medium concentration group and the high concentration group (P < 0.05). A significantly higher BCS score was observed in the high concentration group than the other two groups (P < 0.05). There were significantly higher Ramsay scores and MMSE scores in the medium concentration group than in the low concentration and high concentration groups (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of adverse reactions of the high concentration group was significantly higher than that of the low concentration group (P < 0.05), but showed similar results with the medium concentration group.
Conclusion
The medium concentration group exhibits a better analgesic effect than the low concentration group and higher safety than the high concentration group. Therefore, the use of medium concentration ropivacaine in TFP block may provide a referential basis for clinical treatment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. Li X, Yu L, Yang J, Tan H. Multimodal analgesia with ropivacaine wound infiltration and intravenous flurbiprofen axetil provides enhanced analgesic effects after radical thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0835-2 Erratum in: BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov 13; 19(1): 210.
2. Daiki M, Najar M, Chkili R, Rafrafi A, Ben Gabsia A, Labbène I, et al. Postoperative analgesia after wound infiltration with Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine versus Ropivacaine alone for lumbar discectomies: a randomized-controlled trial. Tunis Med. 2019;97(12):1375–82.
3. Ghezal H, Bouvet S, Kabani S, Ripart J, Cuvillon P. Ropivacaine versus placebo on postoperative analgesia and chronic pain following third molar extraction: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;121(2):113–7.
4. Cheng Q, Bi X, Zhang W, Lu Y, Tian H. Dexmedetomidine versus sufentanil with high- or low-concentration ropivacaine for labor epidural analgesia: a randomized trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019;45(11):2193–201.
5. Feng J, Li K, Feng H, Han Q, Gao M, Xu R. Efficacy of local infiltration of ropivacaine combined with multimodal analgesia with parecoxib for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2019;39(7):830–5.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献