Abstract
AbstractIdentification of ontogenetic age classes plays an important role in the fields of zoology, palaeontology and archaeology, where accurate age classifications of (sub)fossil remains are a crucial component for the reconstruction of past life. Textural ageing—the identification of age-related bone surface textures—provides a size-independent method for age assessment of vertebrate material. However, most of the work so far is limited to qualitative results. While qualitative approaches provide helpful insights on textural ageing patterns, they are heavily subject to observer bias and fall short of quantitative data relevant for detailed statistical analyses and cross-comparisons. Here, we present a pilot study on the application of 3D surface digital microscopy to quantify bone surface textures on the long bones of the grey heron (Ardea cinerea) and the Canada goose (Branta canadensis) using internationally verified roughness parameters. Using a standardised measuring protocol, computed roughness values show a strong correlation with qualitative descriptions of textural patterns. Overall, higher roughness values correspond to increased numbers of grooves and pits and vice versa. Most of the roughness parameters allowed distinguishing between different ontogenetic classes and closely followed the typical sigmoidal animal growth curve. Our results show that bone texture quantification is a feasible approach to identifying ontogenetic age classes.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy,General Environmental Science,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Materials Science,General Chemistry
Reference14 articles.
1. Acosta Hospitaleche C, Picasso MJB. Textural ageing in Pygoscelis antarctica (Aves, Sphenisciformes): a new comparative scale for penguin bones. Vertebrate Zoology. 2020;70(2):125–39.
2. Brown CM, Russell AP, Ryan MJ. Pattern and transition of surficial bone texture of the centrosaurine frill and their ontogenetic and taxonomic implications. J Vertebr Paleontol. 2009;29(1):132–41.
3. Emmans GC. The potential post-hatching growth of domestic birds is sufficiently described by the Gompertz function. Br Poult Sci. 2022;63(5):701–19.
4. Martisius NL, McPherron SP, Schulz-Kornas E, Soressi M, Steele TE. A method for the taphonomic assessment of bone tools using 3D surface texture analysis of bone microtopography. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2020;12(10):251.
5. Sampson SD, Ryan MJ, Tanke DH. Craniofacial ontogeny in centrosaurine dinosaurs (Ornithischia: Ceratopsidae): taxonomic and behavioural implications. Zool J Linn Soc. 1997;121(3):293–337.