Author:
Rezaei Navid,Bagheri Zahra,Golshah Amin
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Retention is an important aspect of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to analyze the survival of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study evaluated the records of 118 orthodontic patients (90 females, 28 males, mean age of 22.34 ± 6.44 years) retrieved from a private orthodontic office. Data regarding the retainer failure, dental caries, unwanted tooth movements, maximum pocket depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) recorded at the follow-up sessions were extracted from patient records. Three types of retainer wires namely Bond-A-Braid, Orthoflex, and Retainium were compared regarding the abovementioned parameters. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, Chi-square, Monte-Carlo Chi-square, and Kruskal Wallis tests, the log rank test, and the Cox regression model.
Results
The frequency of retainer failure was not significantly different between males and females, different age groups, or different treatment durations (P > 0.05). Wire fracture was the most common failure type in both the maxilla and mandible. Also, the frequency of failure was not significantly different between the maxillary and mandibular retainers (P > 0.05). The frequency of failure, and survival of the three types of retainer wires were not significantly different during a 5-year period (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
The three types of orthodontic retainers had comparable survival rates. Their failure rate was not correlated with the age or gender of patients or the treatment duration.
Funder
School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. McNally M, Mullin M, Dhopatkar A, Rock WP. Orthodontic retention: why when and how? Dent Update. 2003;30:446–52.
2. Padmos JAD, Fudalej PS, Renkema AM. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2018;153:496–504.
3. Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Orthodontic retention: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2006;33:205–12.
4. Kaya Y, Tunca M, Keskin S. Comparison of two retention appliances with respect to clinical effectiveness. Turk J Orthod. 2019;32:72–8.
5. Kini V, Patil SM, Jagtap R. Bonded reinforcing materials for esthetic anterior periodontal tooth stabilization: a case report. Int J Dent Clin. 2011;3:90–1.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献