How do face masks impact communication amongst deaf/HoH people?
-
Published:2022-09-05
Issue:1
Volume:7
Page:
-
ISSN:2365-7464
-
Container-title:Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Cogn. Research
Author:
Gutierrez-Sigut EvaORCID, Lamarche Veronica M., Rowley Katherine, Lago Emilio Ferreiro, Pardo-Guijarro María Jesús, Saenz Ixone, Frigola Berta, Frigola Santiago, Aliaga Delfina, Goldberg Laura
Abstract
AbstractFace coverings have been key in reducing the spread of COVID-19. At the same time, they have hindered interpersonal communication, particularly for those who rely on speechreading to aid communication. The available research indicated that deaf/hard of hearing (HoH) people experienced great difficulty communicating with people wearing masks and negative effects on wellbeing. Here we extended these findings by exploring which factors predict deaf/HoH people’s communication difficulties, loss of information, and wellbeing. We also explored the factors predicting perceived usefulness of transparent face coverings and alternative ways of communicating. We report the findings from an accessible survey study, released in two written and three signed languages. Responses from 395 deaf/HoH UK and Spanish residents were collected online at a time when masks were mandatory. We investigated whether onset and level of deafness, knowledge of sign language, speechreading fluency, and country of residence predicted communication difficulties, wellbeing, and degree to which transparent face coverings were considered useful. Overall, deaf/HoH people and their relatives used masks most of the time despite greater communication difficulties. Late-onset deaf people were the group that experienced more difficulties in communication, and also reported lower wellbeing. However, both early- and late-onset deaf people reported missing more information and feeling more disconnected from society than HoH people. Finally, signers valued transparent face shields more positively than non-signers. The latter suggests that, while seeing the lips is positive to everyone, signers appreciate seeing the whole facial expression. Importantly, our data also revealed the importance of visual communication other than speechreading to facilitate face-to-face interactions.
Funder
BA/Leverhulme small grants
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Reference75 articles.
1. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. sage. 2. Atcherson, S. R., Mendel, L. L., Baltimore, W. J., Patro, C., Lee, S., Pousson, M., & Spann, M. J. (2017). The effect of conventional and transparent surgical masks on speech understanding in individuals with and without hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 28(1), 58–67. 3. Ballard, J. (2022, Februeary 23). From pandemic to endemic: The future of masking. Nwes. Faculty & Staff, Researhc & Scholarship. University of Denver. Retrieved from, https://www.du.edu/news/pandemic-endemic-future-masking 4. Banks, B., Gowen, E., Munro, K., & Adank, P. (2021). Eye gaze and perceptual adaptation to audiovisual degraded speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research., 64(9), 3432–3445. 5. Barker, A. B., Leighton, P., & Ferguson, M. A. (2017). Coping together with hearing loss: A qualitative meta-synthesis of the psychosocial experiences of people with hearing loss and their communication partners. International Journal of Audiology, 56(5), 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2017.1286695
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|