Abstract
Abstract
Background
Good Samaritan Laws are a harm reduction policy intended to facilitate a reduction in fatal opioid overdoses by enabling bystanders, first responders, and health care providers to assist individuals experiencing an overdose without facing civil or criminal liability. However, Good Samaritan Laws may not be reaching their full impact in many communities due to a lack of knowledge of protections under these laws, distrust in law enforcement, and fear of legal consequences among potential bystanders. The purpose of this study was to develop a systems-level understanding of the factors influencing bystander responses to opioid overdose in the context of Connecticut’s Good Samaritan Laws and identify high-leverage policies for improving opioid-related outcomes and implementation of these laws in Connecticut (CT).
Methods
We conducted six group model building (GMB) workshops that engaged a diverse set of participants with medical and community expertise and lived bystander experience. Through an iterative, stakeholder-engaged process, we developed, refined, and validated a qualitative system dynamics (SD) model in the form of a causal loop diagram (CLD).
Results
Our resulting qualitative SD model captures our GMB participants’ collective understanding of the dynamics driving bystander behavior and other factors influencing the effectiveness of Good Samaritan Laws in the state of CT. In this model, we identified seven balancing (B) and eight reinforcing (R) feedback loops within four narrative domains: Narrative 1 - Overdose, Calling 911, and First Responder Burnout; Narrative 2 - Naloxone Use, Acceptability, and Linking Patients to Services; Narrative 3 - Drug Arrests, Belief in Good Samaritan Laws, and Community Trust in Police; and Narrative 4 - Bystander Naloxone Use, Community Participation in Harm Reduction, and Cultural Change Towards Carrying Naloxone.
Conclusions
Our qualitative SD model brings a nuanced systems perspective to the literature on bystander behavior in the context of Good Samaritan Laws. Our model, grounded in local knowledge and experience, shows how the hypothesized non-linear interdependencies of the social, structural, and policy determinants of bystander behavior collectively form endogenous feedback loops that can be leveraged to design policies to advance and sustain systems change.
Funder
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference73 articles.
1. CDC WONDER [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jan 6]. Available from: https://wonder.cdc.gov/.
2. Death Rate Maps &. Graphs | Drug Overdose | CDC Injury Center [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/deaths/index.html.
3. Connecticut Department of Public Health. Unintentional drug overdose deaths in Connecticut: A fact sheet – 2020 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jan 13]. Available from: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/DPH/Injury-Prevention/Opioid-Overdose-Data/Fact-Sheets/2020-Fact-sheet-Unintentional-Drug-Overdose-deaths--2020--Updated-on-7-28-2021.pdf.
4. Luo F, State-Level Economic Costs of Opioid Use Disorder and Fatal Opioid Overdose — United States., 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jan 6];70. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7015a1.htm.
5. Reader SW, Walton GH, Linder SH. Review and inventory of 911 good Samaritan Law provisions in the United States. Int J Drug Policy. 2022;110:103896.