Abstract
AbstractThe use of fully online (FO) mathematics teaching has been increasing worldwide. Despite claims and findings that mathematics is more challenging to teach FO than face-to-face (F2F), we know little about FO mathematics teaching.In this paper, we address this gap by working to elucidate the differences between teaching in the FO and F2F modalities. We do this by examining FO and F2F teaching from the perspective of Communities of Practice (Wenger, Social learning systems and communities of practice, 2010) by comparing and contrasting current FO practices (or “ways of doing”) in the general undergraduate education community with current F2F practices in the undergraduate mathematics community. We identify six key differences between the two paradigms, which we recast to spotlight areas for technological and pedagogical development.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Education
Reference82 articles.
1. Abdulwahed, M., Jaworski, B., & Crawford, A. R. (2012). Innovative approaches to teaching mathematics in higher education: A review and critique. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 49–68.
2. Alagic, G., & Alagic, M. (2013). Collaborative mathematics learning in online environments. In Visual mathematics and cyberlearning, (pp. 23–48). Netherlands: Springer.
3. Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. MA: USA.
4. Anderson, T., & Elloumi, F. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Alberta: AU Press.
5. Artigue, M. (2009). The future of teaching and learning mathematics with digital technologies. In C. Hoyles, & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology - rethinking the terrain. The 17th ICMI study, (pp. 463–475). New York: Springer.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献