Author:
Schaupp Julia,Hediger Karin,Wunderli Jean-Marc,Schäffer Beat,Tobias Silvia,Kolecka Natalia,Bauer Nicole
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Stress is a widespread phenomenon and reality of everyday life, entailing negative consequences for physical and psychological wellbeing. Previous studies have indicated that exposure to greenspaces and nature-based interventions are promising approaches to reducing stress and promoting restoration. However, an increasing percentage of the population lives in urban regions with limited opportunities to spend time in greenspaces. In addition, urban settings typically feature increased levels of noise, which represents a major environmental stressor. Although various studies have compared the effects of exposure to greenspaces versus urban built environments, evidence of the effects of noise in this context is very limited. Psychophysiological benefits of exposure to greenspaces compared to urban built environments reported in earlier studies might be less (or at least not only) due to features of the greenspaces than to additional stressors, such as road traffic noise in the urban built environment. Hence, differences in the effects attributed to greenness in previous studies may also be due to potentially detrimental noise effects in comparison settings. This paper reports the study protocol for a randomized, controlled intervention study comparing the effects of walking in forest versus urban built environments, taking road traffic noise exposure during walks in the respective settings into account.
Methods
The protocol envisages a field study employing a pretest–posttest design to compare the effects of 30-min walks in urban built environments and forests with different road traffic noise levels. Assessments will consist of self-reported measures, physiological data (salivary cortisol and skin conductance), an attention test, and noise, as well as greenness measurements. The outcomes will be restoration, stress, positive and negative affect, attention, rumination, and nature connectedness.
Discussion
The results will inform about the restorative effect of walking in general, of exposure to different types of environments, and to different noise levels in these sites. The study will provide insights into the benefits of walking and nature-based interventions, taking into account the potential detrimental effects of noise exposure. It will thus facilitate a better understanding of low-threshold interventions to prevent stress and foster wellbeing.
Trial registration
ISRCTN48943261; Registered 23.11.2023.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference107 articles.
1. Swiss Federal Statistical Office. Arbeitsbedingungen und Gesundheitszustand, 2012–2017: Schweizerische Gesundheitsbefragung (SGB) [Work conditions and health status, 2012–2017: Swiss Health Survey]. 2019. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/catalogues-databases.assetdetail.9366230.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2022.
2. Swiss Federal Statistical Office. Stress und psychosoziale Risiken am Arbeitsplatz haben 2017 zugenommen [Stress and psychosocial risks increased in working life in 2017]. 2019. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/catalogues-databases.assetdetail.9366231.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2023.
3. Osborne MT, Shin LM, Mehta NN, Pitman RK, Fayad ZA, Tawakol A. Disentangling the links between psychosocial stress and cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13:e010931.
4. Santosa A, Rosengren A, Ramasundarahettige C, Rangarajan S, Gulec S, Chifamba J, et al. Psychosocial risk factors and cardiovascular disease and death in a population-based cohort from 21 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2138920.
5. Steptoe A, Kivimäki M. Stress and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012;9:360–70.