Abstract
Abstract
Background
Fever in children represents one of the most common causes of medical evaluation. Infants younger than 90 days of age are at higher risk of severe and invasive bacterial infections (SBI and IBI). However, clinical signs and symptoms of viral and bacterial infections in young infants are frequently similar, and several studies have shown that the risk of SBIs remains non-negligible even in the presence of a positive point-of-care viral test. Our study aims to evaluate whether the proportion of SBIs and IBIs in febrile infants younger than 90 days during the COVID-19 pandemic was higher than that in the pre-pandemic period, and to describe the proportion of SBIs and IBIs in infants with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Methods
This was a retrospective single-center cohort study conducted at the Children's Hospital of the University of Padua in Italy, involving febrile young infants evaluated in the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) and admitted to Pediatric Acute Care Unit (PACU) between March 2017 to December 2022. Infants admitted before the COVID-19 pandemic were compared to infants admitted during the pandemic period and SARS-CoV-2 positive patients to the negative ones.
Results
442 febrile infants younger than 90 days were evaluated in Padua PED and admitted to the wards. The proportion of SBIs and IBIS did not significantly change over the study periods, ranging between 10.8% and 32.6% (p = 0.117) and between 0% and 7.6%, respectively (p = 0.367). The proportion of infants with a diagnosis of SBIs and IBIs was higher in the SARS-CoV-2 negative group (30.3% and 8.2%, respectively) compared to the positive group (8.5% and 2.8%, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The most common diagnosis in both groups was UTI, mainly caused by E. coli. A similar proportion of blood and urine cultures were performed, whereas lumbar puncture was more frequently performed in SARS-CoV-2 negative infants (40.2% vs 16.9%, p = 0.001).
Conclusions
Although the risk of concomitant serious bacterial infection with SARS-CoV-2 is low, it remains non-negligible. Therefore, even in SARS-CoV-2-positive febrile infants, we suggest that the approach to screening for SBIs remains cautious.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Padova
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Tan E, Beck S, Haskell L, MacLean A, Rogan A, Than M, et al. Paediatric fever management practices and antipyretic use among doctors and nurses in New Zealand emergency departments. Emerg Med Australasia. 2022;34(6):943–53.
2. Alpern ER, Stanley RM, Gorelick MH, Donaldson A, Knight S, Teach SJ, et al. Epidemiology of a pediatric emergency medicine research network the PECARN core data project. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22(10). Available from: http://journals.lww.com/pec-online.
3. Hagedoorn NN, Borensztajn DM, Nijman R, Balode A, von Both U, Carrol ED, et al. Variation in antibiotic prescription rates in febrile children presenting to emergency departments across Europe (MOFICHE): a multicentre observational study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(8). Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089714267&doi=10.1371%2fJOURNAL.PMED.1003208&partnerID=40&md5=273867c4543029ee55c60c3840c2a948.
4. Victoria TSR, Yong-Kwang OG, Pin LK, Sashikumar G, Shu-Ling C. Pyrexia in a young infant – is height of fever associated with serious bacterial infection? BMC Pediatr. 2022;22(1):188.
5. Pantell RH, Roberts KB, Adams WG, Dreyer BP, Kuppermann N, O’Leary ST, et al. Evaluation and management of well-appearing febrile infants 8 to 60 days old. Pediatrics. 2021;148(2):e2021052228.