Obstetrical outcome valuations by patients, professionals, and laypersons: differences within and between groups using three valuation methods-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Obstetrical outcome valuations by patients, professionals, and laypersons: differences within and between groups using three valuation methods

Published:2011-11-12 Issue:1 Volume:11 Page:
ISSN:1471-2393
Container-title:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
language:en
Short-container-title:BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

Author:

Bijlenga Denise,Birnie Erwin,Mol Ben WJ,Bonsel Gouke J

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2393-11-93/fulltext.html

Reference42 articles.

1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2006, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Third

2. Shumway M, Saunders T, Shern D, Pines E, Downs A, Burbine T, et al: Preferences for schizophrenia treatment outcomes among public policy makers, consumers, families, and providers. Psychiatr Serv. 2003, 54: 1124-1128. 10.1176/appi.ps.54.8.1124.

3. Kassirer JP: Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions. N Engl J Med. 1994, 330: 1895-1896. 10.1056/NEJM199406303302611.

4. Ossa DF, Briggs A, McIntosh E, Cowell W, Littlewood T, Sculpher M: Recombinant Erythropoietin for Chemotherapy-Related Anaemia: Economic Value and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Assessment Using Direct Utility Elicitation and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007, 25: 223-237. 10.2165/00019053-200725030-00005.

5. Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Jepson C: Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public. Qual Life Res. 2003, 12: 599-607. 10.1023/A:1025119931010.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Using Patient Preferences in Health Technology Assessment: Evaluating Quality-Adjusted Survival Equivalents (QASE) for the Quantification of Non-health Benefits;The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research;2024-02-29

2. The relative importance of clinical factors in initiating interfacility transfer of major trauma patients: A discrete choice experiment;Trauma;2021-11-02

3. Variations in Patients’ Overall Assessment of Their Health Across and Within Disease Groups Using the EQ-5D Questionnaire: Protocol for a Longitudinal Study in the Swedish National Quality Registers;JMIR Research Protocols;2021-08-27

4. Passive slow freezing is an efficacious and cost-effective alternative to controlled slow freezing for ovarian tissue cryopreservation;Cryobiology;2021-06

5. Variations in Patients’ Overall Assessment of Their Health Across and Within Disease Groups Using the EQ-5D Questionnaire: Protocol for a Longitudinal Study in the Swedish National Quality Registers (Preprint);2021-02-02