Author:
Meyers Nelle,Kopke Kathrin,Buhhalko Natalja,Mattsson Karin,Janssen Colin R.,Everaert Gert,De Witte Bavo
Abstract
AbstractThe availability of many microplastic analysis methods is challenging for researchers and policy makers when tasked with choosing optimal methods for their research question and a given budget. In this study, a cost-effectiveness analysis of methods for microplastic analysis in seawater was performed using survey data acquired from experts. Total analysis cost per method was determined accounting for labour and equipment costs, while method effectiveness was scored based on their ability to confirm the plastic nature of particles, their minimum detectable particle size, and other parameters. Results were validated and discussed during two workshops with scientists and policy makers. The resulting predictive tools allow to identify the most cost-effective methods for specific scenarios, and their associated cost. They mark an important step towards a more effective and informed approach to monitoring and managing microplastic pollution in the marine environment, ultimately contributing to the protection of marine ecosystems and human health.
Funder
Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
Marine Institute, Ireland
The Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government (DHPLG), Ireland
The Ministry of the Environment of the Estonian Republic
The Estonian Research Council
Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Adhikari S, Kelkar V, Kumar R, Halden RU. Methods and challenges in the detection of microplastics and nanoplastics: a mini-review. Polym Int. 2022;71(5):543–51.
2. Akhbarizadeh R, Dobaradaran S, Torkmahalleh MA, Saeedi R, Aibaghi R, Ghasemi FF. Suspended fine particulate matter (PM2 5), microplastics (MPs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in air: their possible relationships and health implications. Environ Res. 2020;192:110339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110339.
3. Al-Azzawi MSM, Kunaschk M, Mraz K, Freier KP, Knoop O, Drewes JE. Digest, stain and bleach: Three steps to achieving rapid microplastic fluorescence analysis in wastewater samples. Sci Total Environ. 2023;863:160947.
4. Araujo CF, Nolasco MM, Ribeiro AMP, Ribeiro-Claro PJA. Identification of microplastics using Raman spectroscopy: latest developments and future prospects. Water Res. 2018;142:426–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.060.
5. Arthur C, Baker J.E, Bamford H.A. Proceedings of the International Research Workshop on the Occurrence, Effects, and Fate of Microplastic Marine Debris, September 9–11, 2008. Tacoma, WA, USA: University of Washington Tacoma; 2009.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献