Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality

Published:2009-01-20 Issue:1 Volume:9 Page:
ISSN:1471-2288
Container-title:BMC Medical Research Methodology
language:en
Short-container-title:BMC Med Res Methodol

Author:

Glueck Deborah H,Lamb Molly M,O'Donnell Colin I,Ringham Brandy M,Brinton John T,Muller Keith E,Lewin John M,Alonzo Todd A,Pisano Etta D

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Informatics,Epidemiology

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2288-9-4/fulltext.html

Reference19 articles.

1. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, Cutter GR: Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002, 179: 671-677.

2. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Basett L, D'Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M: Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353: 1773-1783. 10.1056/NEJMoa052911.

3. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ, Mahoney MC, Larsen LH, Barr RG, Farria DM, Marques HS, Boparai K, for the ACRIN 6666 Investigators: Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 2008, 299: 2151-2163. 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151.

4. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J: Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004, 140: 189-202.

5. Pepe MS: The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Test for Classification and Prediction. 2003, New York: Oxford University Press

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Estimating Cancer Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Using Healthcare Utilization Data: Defining the Accuracy Assessment Interval;Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention;2022-08-02

2. Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update;PLOS ONE;2019-10-11

3. Reducing decision errors in the paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests with Gaussian outcomes;BMC Medical Research Methodology;2014-03-05

4. Évaluation statistique d’un biomarqueur;Annales françaises de médecine d'urgence;2011-07-18

5. Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification;Statistics in Medicine;2011-04-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3