Association of identification of facility and transportation for childbirth with institutional delivery in high priority districts of Uttar Pradesh, India
-
Published:2021-10-27
Issue:1
Volume:21
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2393
-
Container-title:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Author:
Rajvanshi Divya,Anthony John,Namasivayam Vasanthakumar,Dehury Bidyadhar,Banadakoppa Manjappa Ramesh,Prakash Ravi,Chintada Dhanunjaya Rao,Khare Shagun,Avery Lisa,Crockett Maryanne,Isac Shajy,Becker Marissa,Blanchard James,Halli Shiva
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Timely and skilled care is key to reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. Birth preparedness involves preparation for safe childbirth during the antenatal period to reach the appropriate health facility for ensuring safe delivery. Hence, understanding the factors associated with birth preparedness and its significance for safe delivery is essential. This paper aims to assess the levels of birth preparedness, its determinants and association with institutional deliveries in High Priority Districts of Uttar Pradesh, India.
Methods
A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between June–October 2018 in the rural areas of 25 high priority districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. Simple random sampling was used to select 40 blocks among 294 blocks in 25 districts and 2646 primary sampling units within the selected blocks. The survey interviewed 9458 women who had a delivery 2 months prior to the survey. Descriptive statistics were included to characterize the study population. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the determinants of birth preparedness and to examine the association of birth preparedness with institutional delivery.
Results
Among the 9458 respondents, 61.8% had birth preparedness (both facility and transportation identified) and 79.1% delivered in a health facility. Women in other caste category (aOR = 1.24, CI 1.06–1.45) and those with 10 or more years of education (aOR = 1.68, CI 1.46–1.92) were more likely to have birth preparedness. Antenatal care (ANC) service uptake related factors like early registration for ANC (aOR = 1.14, CI 1.04–1.25) and three or more front line worker contacts (aOR = 1.61, CI 1.46–1.79) were also found to be significantly associated with birth preparedness. The adjusted multivariate model showed that those who identified both facility and transport were seven times more likely to undergo delivery in a health facility (aOR = 7.00, CI 6.07–8.08).
Conclusion
The results indicate the need for focussing on marginalized groups for improving birth preparedness. Increasing ANC registration in the first trimester of pregnancy, improving frontline worker contact, and optimum utilization of antenatal care check-ups for effective counselling on birth preparedness along with system level improvements could improve birth preparedness and consequently institutional delivery rates in Uttar Pradesh, India.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Reference37 articles.
1. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, WBG, and UNPD, “Trends in maternal mortality: 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and United Nations Population division,” 2019. [Online]. Available: http://apps.who.int/bookorders. Accessed 7 May 2021.
2. Office of the Registrar General of India, “Special Bulletin on Maternal Mortality in India 2016–18,” New Delhi, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Bulletins/MMR Bulletin 2016–18.pdf.
3. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. Sample registration system statistical report: New Delhi; 2018.
4. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, “Population Projections for India and states 2011–2036,” New Delhi.
5. Dandona R, et al. Subnational mapping of under-5 and neonatal mortality trends in India: the global burden of disease study 2000–17. Lancet. 2020;395(10237):1640–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30471-2.