Abstract
Abstract
Background
Decision-to-delivery time (DDT), a crucial factor during the emergency caesarean section, may potentially impact neonatal outcomes. This study aims to assess the association between DDT and various neonatal outcomes.
Methods
A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was conducted. A total of 32 eligible studies that reported on various neonatal outcomes, such as Apgar score, acidosis, neonatal intensive unit (NICU) admissions and mortality were included in the review. Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria, and a random-effects inverse-variance model with DerSimonian-Laird estimate of tau² was used for meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using I² statistics and Egger’s test, respectively.
Results
The meta-analysis revealed a significant association between DDT < 30 min and increased risk of Apgar score < 7 (OR 1.803, 95% CI: 1.284–2.533) and umbilical cord pH < 7.1 (OR 4.322, 95% CI: 2.302–8.115), with substantial heterogeneity. No significant association was found between DDT and NICU admission (OR 0.982, 95% CI: 0.767–1.258) or neonatal mortality (OR 0.983, 95% CI: 0.565–1.708), with negligible heterogeneity. Publication bias was not detected for any outcomes.
Conclusions
This study underscores the association between shorter DDT and increased odds of adverse neonatal outcomes such as low Apgar scores and acidosis, while no significant association was found in terms of NICU admissions or neonatal mortality. Our findings highlight the complexity of DDT’s impact, suggesting the need for nuanced clinical decision-making in cases of emergency caesarean sections.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Soltanifar S, Russell R. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for caesarean section, 2011 update: implications for the anaesthetist. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012;21:264–72.
2. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 487: preparing for clinical emergencies in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:1032–4.
3. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM et al. Overview of Obstetrics. In: Williams Obstetrics. 25th edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018.
4. WHO Recommendations Non-. Clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
5. Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M, et al. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med. 2000;93:346–50.