Clinical significance of retained products of conception in placenta previa: a retrospective analysis

Author:

Kishimoto Naohisa,Miyamoto Morikazu,Imauji Akari,Takada Minori,Nishitani Soko,Tanabe Risa,Ito Tsubasa,Hada Taira,Otsuka Yuka,Takano Masashi

Abstract

Abstract Background Retained products of conception (RPOC) often cause severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) but the clinical significance of RPOC in placenta previa is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of RPOC in women with placenta previa. The primary outcome was to evaluate risk factors of RPOC and the secondary outcome was to consider risk factors of severe PPH. Methods Singleton pregnant women with placenta previa who underwent cesarean section (CS) and placenta removal during the operation at the National Defense Medical College Hospital between January 2004 and December 2021 were identified. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine the frequency and risk factors of RPOC and the association of RPOC with severe PPH in pregnant women with placenta previa. Results This study included 335 pregnant women. Among these, 24 (7.2%) pregnant women developed RPOC. Pregnant women with prior CS (Odds Ratio (OR) 5.98; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 2.35–15.20, p < 0.01), major previa (OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.19–8.32, p < 0.01), and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) (OR 92.7; 95% CI 18.39–467.22, p < 0.01) were more frequent in the RPOC group. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior CS (OR 10.70; 95% CI 3.47–33.00, p < 0.01,) and PAS (OR 140.32; 95% CI 23.84–825.79, p < 0.01) were risk factors for RPOC. In pregnant women who have placenta previa with RPOC or without RPOC, the ratio of severe PPH were 58.3% and 4.5%, respectively (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the occurrence of prior CS (OR 9.23; 95% CI 4.02–21.20, p < 0.01), major previa (OR 11.35; 95% CI 3.35–38.38, p < 0.01), placenta at the anterior wall (OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.40–8.44, p = 0.01), PAS (OR 16.47; 95% CI 4.66–58.26, p < 0.01), and RPOC (OR 29.70; 95% CI 11.23–78.55, p < 0.01) was more in pregnant women with severe PPH. In the multivariate analysis for severe PPH, prior CS (OR 4.71; 95% CI 1.29–17.13, p = 0.02), major previa (OR 7.50; 95% CI 1.98–28.43, p < 0.01), and RPOC (OR 13.26; 95% CI 3.61–48.63, p < 0.01) were identified as risk factors. Conclusions Prior CS and PAS were identified as risk factors for RPOC in placenta previa and RPOC is closely associated with severe PPH. Therefore, a new strategy for RPOC in placenta previa is needed.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3