Analysis of transcript-deleterious variants in Mendelian disorders: implications for RNA-based diagnostics
-
Published:2020-06-17
Issue:1
Volume:21
Page:
-
ISSN:1474-760X
-
Container-title:Genome Biology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Genome Biol
Author:
Maddirevula Sateesh, Kuwahara Hiroyuki, Ewida Nour, Shamseldin Hanan E., Patel Nisha, Alzahrani Fatema, AlSheddi Tarfa, AlObeid Eman, Alenazi Mona, Alsaif Hessa S., Alqahtani Maha, AlAli Maha, Al Ali Hatoon, Helaby Rana, Ibrahim Niema, Abdulwahab Firdous, Hashem Mais, Hanna Nadine, Monies Dorota, Derar Nada, Alsagheir Afaf, Alhashem Amal, Alsaleem Badr, Alhebbi Hamoud, Wali Sami, Umarov Ramzan, Gao Xin, Alkuraya Fowzan S.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
At least 50% of patients with suspected Mendelian disorders remain undiagnosed after whole-exome sequencing (WES), and the extent to which non-coding variants that are not captured by WES contribute to this fraction is unclear. Whole transcriptome sequencing is a promising supplement to WES, although empirical data on the contribution of RNA analysis to the diagnosis of Mendelian diseases on a large scale are scarce.
Results
Here, we describe our experience with transcript-deleterious variants (TDVs) based on a cohort of 5647 families with suspected Mendelian diseases. We first interrogate all families for which the respective Mendelian phenotype could be mapped to a single locus to obtain an unbiased estimate of the contribution of TDVs at 18.9%. We examine the entire cohort and find that TDVs account for 15% of all “solved” cases. We compare the results of RT-PCR to in silico prediction. Definitive results from RT-PCR are obtained from blood-derived RNA for the overwhelming majority of variants (84.1%), and only a small minority (2.6%) fail analysis on all available RNA sources (blood-, skin fibroblast-, and urine renal epithelial cells-derived), which has important implications for the clinical application of RNA-seq. We also show that RNA analysis can establish the diagnosis in 13.5% of 155 patients who had received “negative” clinical WES reports. Finally, our data suggest a role for TDVs in modulating penetrance even in otherwise highly penetrant Mendelian disorders.
Conclusions
Our results provide much needed empirical data for the impending implementation of diagnostic RNA-seq in conjunction with genome sequencing.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Alkuraya FS. Discovery of mutations for Mendelian disorders. Hum Genet. 2016;135:615–23. 2. Adams DR, Eng CM. Next-generation sequencing to diagnose suspected genetic disorders. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1353–62. 3. Monies D, Abouelhoda M, Assoum M, Moghrabi N, Rafiullah R, Almontashiri N, Alowain M, Alzaidan H, Alsayed M, Subhani S: Lessons learned from large-scale, first-tier clinical exome sequencing in a highly consanguineous population. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(6):1182-201. 4. Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, Bainbridge MN, Willis A, Ward PA, Braxton A, Beuten J, Xia F, Niu Z. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1502–11. 5. Lee H, Deignan JL, Dorrani N, Strom SP, Kantarci S, Quintero-Rivera F, Das K, Toy T, Harry B, Yourshaw M. Clinical exome sequencing for genetic identification of rare Mendelian disorders. JAMA. 2014;312:1880–7.
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|