Author:
Zubair Muhammad,Naz Lubna,Sriram Shyamkumar
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The increased socioeconomic inequality in catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) disproportionately affects disadvantaged populations, subjecting them to financial hardships, limiting their access to healthcare, and exacerbating their vulnerability to morbidity.
Objectives
This study examines changes in socioeconomic inequality related to CHE and analyzes the contributing factors responsible for these changes in Pakistan between 2010-11 and 2018-19.
Methods
This paper extracted the data on out-of-pocket health expenditures from the National Health Accounts for 2009-10 and 2017-18. Sociodemographic information was gathered from the Household Integrated Economic Surveys of 2010-11 and 2018-19. CHE was calculated using budget share and the ability-to-pay approaches. To assess socioeconomic inequality in CHE in 2010-11 and 2018-19, both generalized and standard concentration indices were used, and Wagstaff inequality decomposition analysis was employed to explore the causes of socioeconomic inequality in each year. Further, an Oaxaca-type decomposition was applied to assess changes in socioeconomic inequality in CHE over time.
Results
The concentration index reveals that socioeconomic inequality in CHE decreased in 2018-19 compared to 2010-11 in Pakistan. Despite the reduction in inequality, CHE was concentrated among the poor in Pakistan in 2010-11 and 2018-19. The inequality decomposition analysis revealed that wealth status was the main cause of inequality in CHE over time. The upper wealth quantiles indicated a positive contribution, whereas lower quantiles showed a negative contribution to inequality in CHE. Furthermore, urban residence contributed to pro-rich inequality, whereas employed household heads, private healthcare provider, and inpatient healthcare utilization contributed to pro-poor inequality. A noticeable decline in socioeconomic inequality in CHE was observed between 2010 and 2018. However, inequality remained predominantly concentrated among the lower socio-economic strata.
Conclusion
These results underscore the need to improve the outreach of subsidized healthcare and expand social safety nets.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Hogan DR, Stevens GA, Hosseinpoor AR, Boerma T. Monitoring universal health coverage within the sustainable development goals: development and baseline data for an index of essential health services. Lancet Glob Heal [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Feb 5];6(2):e152–68. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2214109X17304722?token=68B9202A324A078CCD28864678DD16682032C84AF6C2CCB96653E40E7AA0DAB8974F607E06DD65E7E68E7B2E22C760D7&originRegion=eu-west-1&originCreation=20220205092620
2. Abimbola S. Inequity of healthcare access and use and catastrophic health spending in slum communities: a retrospective, cross-sectional survey in four countries. BMJ Glob Heal [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 5];6(11). http://gh.bmj.com/.
3. Rahman T, Gasbarro D, Alam K. Financial risk protection from out-of-pocket health spending in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the literature. Heal Res Policy Syst [Internet]. 2022 Dec 1 [cited 2023 Oct 4];20(1). Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC9336110/.
4. Global spending on. health: a world in transition [Internet]. World Health Organisation. 2019 [cited 2022 Feb 5]. http://apps.who.int/bookorders.
5. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Pakistan bureau of statistics national health accounts [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jul 19]. www.pbs.gov.pk.