Sound psychometric properties of a short new screening tool for patient safety climate: applying a Rasch model analysis

Author:

Skyttberg Niclas,Kottorp Anders,Alenius Lisa Smeds

Abstract

Abstract Background WHO recommends repeated measurement of patient safety climate in health care and to support monitoring an 11 item questionnaire on sustainable safety engagement (HSE) has been developed by the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. This study aimed to validate the psychometric properties of the HSE. Methods Survey responses (n = 761) from a specialist care provider organization in Sweden was used to evaluate psychometric properties of the HSE 11-item questionnaire. A Rasch model analysis was applied in a stepwise process to evaluate evidence of validity and precision/reliability in relation to rating scale functioning, internal structure, response processes, and precision in estimates. Results Rating scales met the criteria for monotonical advancement and fit. Local independence was demonstrated for all HSE items. The first latent variable explained 52.2% of the variance. The first ten items demonstrated good fit to the Rasch model and were included in the further analysis and calculation of an index measure based on the raw scores. Less than 5% of the respondents demonstrated low person goodness-of-fit. Person separation index > 2. The flooring effect was negligible and the ceiling effect 5.7%. No differential item functioning was shown regarding gender, time of employment, role within organization or employee net promotor scores. The correlation coefficient between the HSE mean value index and the Rasch-generated unidimensional measures of the HSE 10-item scale was r = .95 (p < .01). Conclusions This study shows that an eleven-item questionnaire can be used to measure a common dimension of staff perceptions on patient safety. The responses can be used to calculate an index that enables benchmarking and identification of at least three different levels of patient safety climate. This study explores a single point in time, but further studies may support the use of the instrument to follow development of the patient safety climate over time by repeated measurement.

Funder

Karolinska Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference47 articles.

1. Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021–2030. https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety/policy/global-patient-safety-action-plan. Accessed 20 Mar 2022.

2. Slawomirski L, Auraaen A, Klazinga N. The economics of patient safety strengthening a value-based approach to reducing patient harm at national level. 2017.

3. K Bienassis de S Kristensen M Burtscher I Brownwood NS Klazinga 2020 Culture as a cure: Assessments of patient safety culture in OECD countries https://doi.org/10.1787/6ee1aeae-en.

4. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:216–23.

5. Kristensen S, Bartels P. Use of Patient Safety Culture Instruments and Recommendations. 2012. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/chafea_pdb/assets/files/pdb/2007109/2007109_eunetpas-report-use-of-psci-and-recommandations-april-8-2010.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3