Author:
Oude Geerdink Esmee,Sewdas Ranu,van Kempen Hetty,van Weeghel Jaap,Anema Johannes R.,Huysmans Maaike A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to explore the experiences and needs of (ex-)welfare benefit recipients from a large urban municipality in the Netherlands regarding their welfare-to-work services and their case workers.
Methods
Quantitative data from a client satisfaction survey that was filled out by 213 people (response rate 11%) who received welfare-to-work services was combined with results from four group interviews with a total of 15 people receiving welfare-to-work services. Verbatim transcripts from the interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
Results
The survey results showed that most clients were reasonably satisfied with the welfare-to-work services they received. Four main themes emerged from the interviews: (1) experiences and needs related to the interactions between case workers and benefit recipients; (2) the need for tailored services; (3) the complicating role of the system the case workers operate within; and (4) the existence of differences between case workers regarding how strict they followed the rules and to what extent they connected with their clients on a personal level.
Conclusions
Our findings show that clients were reasonably satisfied with the welfare-to-work services provided by their municipality but that there is still room for improvement. Case workers should have good social skills to build a trusting relationship with the client, welfare-to-work services should be tailored to the individual, and clear concise information should be given to welfare benefit recipients, especially with regard to what benefit recipients can expect of the municipality and the case workers, given their dual role in supporting (re-)integration to work and monitoring benefit eligibility.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Herbig B, Dragano N, Angerer P. Health in the long-term unemployed. Deutsches Arzteblatt International. 2013;110(23–24):413–9.
2. GezondIn. Bijstandsgerechtigden en gezondheid. https://www.gezondin.nu/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Pharos-Kennisdossier-INLEG-Participatie.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2020.
3. Shahidi FV, Ramraj C, Sod-Erdene O, Hildebrand V, Siddiqi A. The impact of social assistance programs on population health: a systematic review of research in high-income countries. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):2.
4. Schuring M, Mackenbach J, Voorham T, Burdorf A. The effect of re-employment on perceived health. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2011;65(7):639–44.
5. van der Noordt M, H IJ, Droomers M, Proper KI. Health effects of employment: a systematic review of prospective studies. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(10):730–6.