Author:
Anaraki Nahid Rahimipour,Mukhopadhyay Meghraj,Jewer Jennifer,Patey Christopher,Norman Paul,Hurley Oliver,Etchegary Holly,Asghari Shabnam
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The implementation of intervention programs in Emergency Departments (EDs) is often fraught with complications due to the inherent complexity of the environment. Hence, the exploration and identification of barriers and facilitators prior to an implementation is imperative to formulate context-specific strategies to ensure the tenability of the intervention.
Objectives
In assessing the context of four EDs prior to the implementation of SurgeCon, a quality improvement program for ED efficiency and patient satisfaction, this study identifies and explores the barriers and facilitators to successful implementation from the perspective of the healthcare providers, patients, researchers, and decision-makers involved in the implementation.
Settings
Two rural and two urban Canadian EDs with 24/7 on-site physician support.
Methods
Data were collected prior to the implementation of SurgeCon, by means of qualitative and quantitative methods consisting of semi-structured interviews with 31 clinicians (e.g., physicians, nurses, and managers), telephone surveys with 341 patients, and structured observations from four EDs. The interpretive description approach was utilized to analyze the data gathered from interviews, open-ended questions of the survey, and structured observations.
Results
A set of five facilitator-barrier pairs were extracted. These key facilitator-barrier pairs were: (1) management and leadership, (2) available resources, (3) communications and networks across the organization, (4) previous intervention experiences, and (5) need for change.
Conclusion
Improving our understanding of the barriers and facilitators that may impact the implementation of a healthcare quality improvement intervention is of paramount importance. This study underscores the significance of identifing the barriers and facilitators of implementating an ED quality improvement program and developing strategies to overcome the barriers and enhance the facilitators for a successful implementations. We propose a set of strategies for hospitals when implementing such interventions, these include: staff training, champion selection, communicating the value of the intervention, promoting active engagement of ED staff, assigning data recording responsibilities, and requiring capacity analysis.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04789902. 10/03/2021.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. The Commonwealth Fund. The commonwealth fund 2010 international health policy survey in eleven countries. 2010. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Surveys/View-All.aspx, http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/files/publications/chartbook/2010/pdf_2010_ihp_survey_chartpack_full_12022010.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2012.
2. Canadian Institute for Health Information. NACRS: Emergency Department Visits and Lengths of Stay. 2023. Retrieved from https://www.cihi.ca/en/nacrs-emergency-department-visits-and-lengths-of-stay
3. Magid DJ, Sullivan AF, Cleary PD, Rao SR, Gordon JA, Kaushal R, Guadagnoli E, Camargo CA, Blumenthal D. The safety of emergency care systems: results of a survey of clinicians in 65 US emergency departments. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2009;53(6):715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.10.007.
4. Bernstein SL, Aronsky D, Duseja R, Epstein S, Handel D, Hwang U, McCarthy M, John McConnell K, Pines JM, Rathlev N, Schafermeyer R, Zwemer F, Schull M, Asplin BR. The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x.
5. Pines JM, Hollander JE. Emergency department crowding is associated with poor care for patients with severe pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.07.008.