Author:
Kirk Jeanette Wassar,Lindstroem Mette Bendtz,Stefánsdóttir Nina Thórný,Andersen Ove,Powell Byron J.,Nilsen Per,Tjørnhøj-Thomsen Tine
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Danish Health Authority recommended the implementation of new types of emergency departments. Organizational changes in the hospital sector challenged the role, identity, and autonomy of medical specialists. They tend to identify with their specialty, which can challenge successful implementation of change. However, investigations on specialty identity are rare in implementation science, and how the co-existence of different specialty identities influences the implementation of new emergency departments needs to be explored for the development of tailored implementation strategies. The aim of this study was to examine how medical specialty identity influences collaboration between physicians when implementing a new emergency department in Denmark.
Methods
Qualitative methods in the form of participants’ observations at 13 oilcloth sessions (a micro-simulation method) were conducted followed up by 53 individual semi-structured interviews with participants from the oilcloth sessions. Out of the 53 interviews, 26 were conducted with specialists. Data from their interviews are included in this study. Data were analysed deductively inspired by Social Identity Theory.
Results
The analysis yielded three overarching themes: [1] ongoing creation and re-creation of specialty identity through boundary drawing; [2] social categorization and power relations; and [3] the patient as a boundary object.
Conclusions
Specialty identity is an important determinant of collaboration among physicians when implementing a new emergency department. Specialty identity involves social categorization, which entails ongoing creation and re-creation of boundary drawing and exercising of power among the physicians. In some situations, the patient became a positive boundary object, increasing the possibility for a successful collaboration and supporting successful implementation, but direct expressions of boundaries and mistrust were evident. Both were manifested through a dominating power expressed through social categorization in the form of in- and out-groups and in an “us and them” discourse, which created distance and separation among physicians from different specialties. This distancing and separation became a barrier to the implementation of the new emergency department.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Salvatore D, Numerato D, Fattore G. Physicians’ professional autonomy and their organizational identification with their hospital. BMC Health Serv Res December. 2018;18(1):775.
2. The Danish Health Authority. Enhanced emergency health service - recommendations for regional planning. 2007. Copenhagen: The Danish Health Authority; 2007.
3. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Anbefalinger for organisering af den akutte sundhedsindsats - Planlægningsgrundlag for de kommende 10 år. 2020;144.
4. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Vurdering af et speciale i akut-medicin i Danmark [Internet]. 2017. Tilgængelig hos: 978-87-7104-902-2.
5. Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations Monterey., CA: Brooks/Cole; 1979. pp. 33–47.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献