Author:
Sandoval Selina,Chen Grace,Rafie Sally,Rabin Borsika,Mody Sheila,Averbach Sarah
Abstract
Abstract
Background
90% of United States’ counties do not have a single clinic offering abortion care, and barriers to care disproportionately affect low-income families. Novel models of abortion care delivery, including provision of medication abortion in pharmacies, with pharmacists prescribing medication, have the potential to expand access to abortion care. Pharmacists are well-positioned to independently provide abortion care and are highly accessible to patients, however medication abortion provision by pharmacists is not currently legal or available in the United States. To assess the potential acceptability of pharmacist provision of medication abortion and to identify anticipated barriers and facilitators to this model of care, we explored pharmacists’ attitudes towards providing medication abortion, inclusive of patient selection, counseling, and medication prescribing.
Methods
From May to October 2021, we conducted 20 semi-structured qualitative interviews with pharmacists across the United States, guided by the domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science Research.
Results
Major themes included there is a need for pharmacist provision of medication abortion and pharmacists perceive provision of medication abortion to be potentially acceptable if anticipated barriers are addressed. Anticipated barriers identified included personal, religious, and political beliefs of pharmacists and lack of space and systems to support the model. Ensuring adequate staffing with pharmacists willing to participate, private space, time for counseling, safe follow-up, training, and reimbursement mechanisms were perceived strategies to facilitate successful implementation.
Conclusions
Pharmacist identified implementation strategies are needed to reduce anticipated barriers to pharmacist provision of medication abortion.
Funder
Society of Family Planning
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Jones RK, Witwer E, Jerman J. Abortion Incidence and Service Availability in the United States, 2017 [Internet]. New York; 2019 Sep. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-incidence-service-availability-us-2017
2. Gerdts C, Fuentes L, Grossman D, White K, Keefe-Oates B, Baum SE et al. Impact of clinic closures on women obtaining abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas. Am J Public Health [Internet]. 2016 May 1 [cited 2022 Jan 17];106(5):857–64. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2021/11/new-evidence-texas-residents-have-obtained-abortions-least-12-states-do-not-border
3. Adams M, Kully G, Tilford S, White K, Mody S, Hildebrand M et al. Time from first clinical contact to abortion in Texas and California. Contraception [Internet]. 2022 Jun 1 [cited 2022 May 23];110:76–80. Available from: http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010782421004716/fulltext
4. Raifman S, Orlando M, Rafie S, Grossman D. Medication abortion: potential for improved patient access through pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2018;58(4):377–81.
5. Qato DM, Zenk S, Wilder J, Harrington R, Gaskin D, Alexander GC. The availability of pharmacies in the United States: 2007–2015. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):2007–15.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献