Author:
Zoccarato Francesca,Manzoni Martina,Minotti Davide,Lettieri Emanuele,Boaretto Andrea
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The escalating prevalence of diabetes, with its multifaceted complications, poses a pressing challenge for healthcare systems globally. In response, the advent of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, offering technological solutions for daily diabetes management, presents significant opportunities. However, the widespread adoption faces several barriers, linked both to the technological configuration of the devices and to the psychological dimension of patients. Therefore, this study aims to apply and test a theoretical model that investigates the antecedents of the intention to use Continuous Glucose Monitoring systems.
Methods
The research model was built to unveil the impacts of psychological factors, functional components and rational constructs derived from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) on CGM systems sustained adoption. To ensure the comparability of results, we have collected data from people who had used Dexcom ONE Dexcom (San Diego, CA) for the first time for at least one month. Employing Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) techniques, the hypothesized relationships among constructs were assessed.
Results
The analyses confirmed the positive correlation of rational factors to the Intention to Use. Subjective Norm, intended as the physicians’ influence, is positively correlated with the Perceived Usefulness. Trend Arrows, albeit being negatively correlated with Perceived Usefulness, have a positive correlation on Perceived Ease Of Use, reinforcing its mediating effect towards Perceived Usefulness. Among psychological factors, Trust in the CGM technology positively correlates with Intention to Use. Health Literacy is negatively correlated to the Intention to Use.
Conclusions
These findings contribute to theoretical and managerial understanding, providing recommendations to enhance the adoption of CGM systems like Dexcom ONE.
Funder
Roche Diabetes Care Italy Spa
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. WHO, Diabetes, Key facts [Internet]. 2023 apr. Disponibile su: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes.
2. Diabete.com. I numeri del diabete in Italia [Internet]. 2022 nov. Disponibile su: https://www.diabete.com/impatto-del-diabete-italia/.
3. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2021 | IDF Diabetes Atlas [Internet]. 2021. Disponibile su: https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/.
4. Marcellusi A, Viti R, Mecozzi A, Mennini FS. The direct and indirect cost of diabetes in Italy: a prevalence probabilistic approach. Eur J Health Econ Marzo. 2016;17(2):139–47.
5. Adams AS, Mah C, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, Barton MB, Ross-Degnan D. Barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose among adults with diabetes in an HMO: a cross sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res Dicembre. 2003;3(1):6.