Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation

Author:

Coccolini FedericoORCID, ,Kluger Yoram,Moore Ernest E.,Maier Ronald V.,Coimbra Raul,Ordoñez Carlos,Ivatury Rao,Kirkpatrick Andrew W.,Biffl Walter,Sartelli Massimo,Hecker Andreas,Ansaloni Luca,Leppaniemi Ari,Reva Viktor,Civil Ian,Vega Felipe,Chiarugi Massimo,Chichom-Mefire Alain,Sakakushev Boris,Peitzman Andrew,Chiara Osvaldo,Abu-Zidan Fikri,Maegele Marc,Miccoli Mario,Chirica Mircea,Khokha Vladimir,Sugrue Michael,Fraga Gustavo P.,Otomo Yasuhiro,Baiocchi Gian Luca,Catena Fausto

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Emergency Medicine,Surgery

Reference8 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for trauma quality improvement programmes. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2009. ISBN 9789241597746

2. Gruen RL, Gabbe BJ, Stelfox HT, Cameron PA. Indicators of the quality of trauma care and the performance of trauma systems. Br J Surg. 2012;99(Suppl 1):97–104.

3. Gruen RL, Jurkovich GJ, McIntyre LK, Foy HM, Maier RV. Patterns of errors contributing to trauma mortality: lessons learned from 2594 deaths. Ann Surg. 2006;244:371–80.

4. West JG, Trunkey DD, Lim RC. Systems of trauma care. A study of two counties. Arch Surg. 1979;114:455–60.

5. Quality of Trauma for Adult Care Committee. Guide to quality indicators in adult trauma care. Calgary University. 2013 Jan. (https://site.cmg.io/scnresearch/00000000144.pdf. Access July 2020)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3