Factors associated with the development of septic shock in patients with candidemia: a post hoc analysis from two prospective cohorts
-
Published:2020-03-26
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1364-8535
-
Container-title:Critical Care
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Crit Care
Author:
Bassetti MatteoORCID, Vena Antonio, Meroi Marco, Cardozo Celia, Cuervo Guillermo, Giacobbe Daniele Roberto, Salavert Miguel, Merino Paloma, Gioia Francesca, Fernández-Ruiz Mario, López-Cortés Luis Eduardo, Almirante Benito, Escolà-Vergé Laura, Montejo Miguel, Aguilar-Guisado Manuela, Puerta-Alcalde Pedro, Tasias Mariona, Ruiz-Gaitán Alba, González Fernando, Puig-Asensio Mireia, Marco Francesc, Pemán Javier, Fortún Jesus, Aguado Jose Maria, Soriano Alejandro, Carratalá Jordi, Garcia-Vidal Carolina, Valerio Maricela, Sartor Assunta, Bouza Emilio, Muñoz Patricia
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Almost one third of the patients with candidemia develop septic shock. The understanding why some patients do and others do not develop septic shock is very limited. The objective of this study was to identify variables associated with septic shock development in a large population of patients with candidemia.
Methods
A post hoc analysis was performed on two prospective, multicenter cohort of patients with candidemia from 12 hospitals in Spain and Italy. All episodes occurring from September 2016 to February 2018 were analyzed to assess variables associated with septic shock development defined according to The Third International Consensus Definition for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
Results
Of 317 candidemic patients, 99 (31.2%) presented septic shock attributable to candidemia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identifies the following factors associated with septic shock development: age > 50 years (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.03–6.41, p = 0.04), abdominal source of the infection (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.04–4.55, p = 0.04), and admission to a general ward at the time of candidemia onset (OR 0.21, 95% CI, 0.12–0.44, p = 0.001). Septic shock development was independently associated with a greater risk of 30-day mortality (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.08–4.24, p = 0.02).
Conclusions
Age and abdominal source of the infection are the most important factors significantly associated with the development of septic shock in patients with candidemia. Our findings suggest that host factors and source of the infection may be more important for development of septic shock than intrinsic virulence factors of organisms.
Funder
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Reference41 articles.
1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–54. 2. Payen DM, Guilhot J, Launey Y, Lukaszewicz AC, Kaaki M, Veber B, et al. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(6):975–84. 3. Bassetti M, Vena A, Russo A. Management of patients with septic shock due to Candida infection. Hosp Pract (1995). 2018;46(5):258–65. 4. Bassetti M, Righi E, Ansaldi F, Merelli M, Trucchi C, De Pascale G, et al. A multicenter study of septic shock due to candidemia: outcomes and predictors of mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(6):839–45. 5. Kollef M, Micek S, Hampton N, Doherty JA, Kumar A. Septic shock attributed to Candida infection: importance of empiric therapy and source control. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(12):1739–46.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|