Abstract
Abstract
Background
The teaching of palliative care competencies is an essential component of undergraduate medical education. There is significant variance in the palliative care content delivered in undergraduate medical curricula, revealing the utility of reference standards to guide curricular development and assessment. To evaluate our university’s undergraduate palliative care teaching, we undertook a curriculum mapping exercise, comparing official learning objectives to the national Educating Future Physicians in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (EFPPEC) and the international Palliative Education Assessment Tool (PEAT) reference objectives.
Methods
Multiple assessors independently compared our university’s UGME learning objectives with EFPPEC and PEAT reference objectives to determine the degree-of-coverage. Visual curriculum maps were created to depict in which part of the curriculum each objective is delivered and by which medical specialty.
Results
Of 122 EFPPEC objectives, 55 (45.1%) were covered fully, 42 (34.4%) were covered partially, and 25 (20.5%) were not covered by university objectives. Of 89 PEAT objectives, 40 (44.9%) were covered fully, 35 (39.3%) were covered partially, and 14 (15.7%) were not covered by university objectives.
Conclusions
The majority of EFPPEC and PEAT reference objectives are fully or partially covered in our university’s undergraduate medical curriculum. Our approach could serve as a guide for others who endeavour to review their universities’ specialty-specific medical education against reference objectives. Future curriculum development should target the elimination of identified gaps and evaluate the attainment of palliative care competencies by medical learners.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Quality health services and palliative care: Practical approaches and resources to support policy, strategy and practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/345674/9789240035164-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 9 Dec 2021.
2. Bharmal A, Morgan T, Kuhn I, Wee B, Barclay S. Palliative and end-of-life care and junior doctors’: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019: bmjspcare-2019–001954. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001954
3. Corradi MLG, Duim E, Rodrigues CIS. Death and end of life: Perceptions throughout the career about death, palliative care, and educational process. J Palliat Care. 2020;36(4):243–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0825859720923435.
4. Ioshimoto T, Shitara DI, do Prado GF, Pizzoni R, Sassi RH, de Gois AFT. Education is an important factor in end-of-life care: Results from a survey of Brazilian physicians’ attitudes and knowledge in end-of-life medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02253-8
5. Kim DY, Kim KJ, Shin SJ, Heo DS, Lee SN, Nam EM. Factors that influence attitudes toward end-of-life care among medical students: Nationwide survey for fourth-year Korean medical students. Am J Hosp and Palliat Med. 2019;36(6):460–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909118822287.