Author:
Jaeken Jasmien,Billiouw Cathoo,Mertens Lien,Van Bostraeten Pieter,Bekkering Geertruida,Vermandere Mieke,Aertgeerts Bert,van Mileghem Laura,Delvaux Nicolas
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Shared decision making (SDM) has been presented as the preferred approach for decisions where there is more than one acceptable option and has been identified a priority feature of high-quality patient-centered care. Considering the foundation of trust between general practitioners (GPs) and patients and the variety of diseases in primary care, the primary care context can be viewed as roots of SDM. GPs are requesting training programs to improve their SDM skills leading to a more patient-centered care approach. Because of the high number of training programs available, it is important to overview these training interventions specifically for primary care and to explore how these training programs are evaluated.
Methods
This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. Eight different databases were used in December 2022 and updated in September 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using ICROMS. Training effectiveness was analyzed using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model and categorized according to training format (online, live or blended learning).
Results
We identified 29 different SDM training programs for GPs. SDM training has a moderate impact on patient (SMD 0.53 95% CI 0.15–0.90) and observer reported SDM skills (SMD 0.59 95%CI 0.21–0.97). For blended training programs, we found a high impact for quality of life (SMD 1.20 95% CI -0.38-2.78) and patient reported SDM skills (SMD 2.89 95%CI -0.55-6.32).
Conclusion
SDM training improves patient and observer reported SDM skills in GPs. Blended learning as learning format for SDM appears to show better effects on learning outcomes than online or live learning formats. This suggests that teaching facilities designing SDM training may want to prioritize blended learning formats. More homogeneity in SDM measurement scales and evaluation approaches and direct comparisons of different types of educational formats are needed to develop the most appropriate and effective SDM training format.
Trial registration
PROSPERO: A systematic review of shared-decision making training programs in a primary care setting. PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023393385 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023393385.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference71 articles.
1. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):531–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x.
2. Kramer P, Damhuis E, Verhue D. Samen Beslissen: Doelgroepenonderzoek onder zorgverleners en zorggebruikers. Campagne Samen Beslissen in de Zorg. Programma Uitkomstgerichte Zorg. The Netherlands: KANTAR; 2022. p. 5–79. https://demedischspecialist.nl/sites/default/files/2022-10/rapport_campagne_effectmeting_samen_beslissen_eindmeting.pdf.
3. Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(12):1865–78.
4. Force UPST. Collaboration and Shared decision-making between patients and clinicians in preventive health care decisions and US preventive services task force recommendations. JAMA. 2022;327(12):1171–6.
5. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50(460):892–9.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献