Author:
Harvey Christopher-James,Maile Edward J.,Baptista Ana,Pinder Richard J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In 2019 a new Lifestyle Medicine (LM) module was introduced to the undergraduate medical curriculum at Imperial College London. Lifestyle Medicine is an emergent discipline which aims to tackle the increasing burden of non-communicable disease. Previous work has suggested that students value clinical teaching over traditional Public Health topics. Taking a constructivist view of learning, this paper assesses changes in medical students’ attitudes towards Public Health and LM in response to living through a pandemic. We then make suggestions as to how this lived experience might be useful in teaching LM, and discuss the interaction between teaching, behaviour, and experience with consideration of self-determination theories in learning.
Methods
First-year medical students were surveyed at the end of their first year of teaching and asked if living during the COVID-19 pandemic had changed the value they place on LM and if so, how. Thematic analysis was conducted on responses representing 71% (n = 216) of the year group.
Results
Four themes were defined in the data: acknowledging importance; impact on behaviour; health inequalities and the wider determinants; and promoting Public Health and prevention. These themes highlight the distinct levels through which the pandemic has had an impact: from personal behaviour to population health.
Conclusions
This is the first study to look at the impact of living through a pandemic on attitudes to LM. Our results suggest that the pandemic has led to increased reflection on health behaviours. The lived-experience of COVID-19 may facilitate a better understanding of health inequalities and their impact, alongside the opportunities presented by effective LM interventions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference36 articles.
1. Yeh B-I, Kong ID. The advent of LM. J Lifestyle Med. 2013;3(1):1–8.
2. Mechanick JI, Kushner RF. Why LM? LM: Springer; 2016. p. 1–8.
3. Nunan D, Blane DN, McCartney M. Exemplary medical care or Trojan horse? An analysis of the ‘LM’movement. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(706):229–32.
4. Moffat M, Sinclair HK, Cleland JA, Smith WCS, Taylor RJ. Epidemiology teaching: student and tutor perceptions. Med Teach. 2004;26(8):691–5.
5. Lyon AK, Hothersall EJ, Gillam S. Teaching public health in UK medical schools: ‘things have improved: teaching no longer feels like an expensive hobby.’ J Public Health. 2016;38(3):e309–15.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献