What can implementation science offer civil society in their efforts to drive rights-based health reform?

Author:

Uberoi DiyaORCID,Ojo Tolulope,Sriharan Abi,Lau Lincoln

Abstract

AbstractOver the years, civil society organizations (CSOs) have made tremendous efforts to ensure that state policies, programmes, and actions facilitate equitable access to healthcare. While CSOs are key actors in the realization of the right to health, a systematic understanding of how CSOs achieve policy change is lacking. Implementation science, a discipline focused on the methods and strategies facilitating the uptake of evidence-based practice and research can bring relevant, untapped methodologies to understand how CSOs drive health reforms. This article argues for the use of evidence-based strategies to enhance civil society action. We hold that implementation science can offer an actionable frame to aid CSOs in deciphering the mechanisms and conditions in which to pursue rights-based actions most effectively. More empirical studies are needed to generate evidence and CSOs have already indicated the need for more data-driven solutions to empower activists to hold policymakers to account. Although implementation science may not resolve all the challenges CSOs face, its frameworks and approaches can provide an innovative way for organizations to chart out a course for reform. 

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Health (social science),Epidemiology

Reference56 articles.

1. Civil Society Report [Internet]. Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Civil Society Report. WHO; 2007 [cited 2022Dec5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/commission-on-social-determinants-of-health-civil-society-report

2. Greer S, Wismar M, Kosinska M. Strategies for working with society: what is it and what are the tools and contexts for success. European Journal of Public Health. 2016;26(suppl_1).

3. Forman L. Making the case for human rights in global health education, research and policy. Can J Public Health. 2011;102(3):207–9.

4. KELIN. Threat Posed By 2008 Anti-Counterfeit Act To Access Generic Medicines In Kenya [Internet]. Nairobi: KELIN; 2012. Available from: http://kelinkenya.org/wpcontent/uploads/2010/10/Anti-Counterfeit-Act-to-Access-Generic-Medicines-in-Kenyabooklet.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2022.

5. Mamo D. The state of shrinking civic space in India—2021 [Internet]. IWGIA. 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 5]. Available from: https://www.iwgia.org/en/resources/publications/4828-shrinking

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3