Author:
Hlukhov Ivan,Pityn Maryan,Drobot Katerina,Hlukhova Hanna
Abstract
Introduction. Given the clear priorities underlying physical education of student youth, it is mandatory for them to mastering the system of applied skills. At the same time, the objectification of the orientation of content of the swimming instruction system for students of free higher education institution should be carried out taking into account the opinions of the subjects of this process, namely students.
Aim is to determine the subjective opinion of students different faculties of Kherson State University on the organizational features of swimming classes.
Material and methods. There were involved in the survey (during September-October 2020) applicants of higher education of the first (bachelor's) and second (master's) degrees of Kherson State University. In total, there were 1513 respondents, including 646 of first-year students, 458 of second-year students, 164 of third-year students, 213 of fourth-year students, and only 32 of 5-6-year students. There were used the following research methods: theoretical analysis and generalization, study of documentary materials, sociological methods of survey (questionnaire), methods of mathematical statistics.
Results. In the process of determining the subjective opinion applicants for higher education different faculties of Kherson State University on the organizational features of swimming classes indicated the priority of classes once a week (45.13% of respondents). Other basic options have gained significantly lower values (once every two weeks - 26.13 % and twice a week - 18.40% of respondents). According to the opinion of students different faculties, the priority duration of classes should be 45-60 minutes (44.29%) or 30-45 minutes (31.72% of respondents) with the involvement of an approximate number of students in the range of 4-12 people at one swimming class.
Conclusions. The preferred form of swimming classes is self-classes for students (45.73%), and classes with a teacher are supported by a total of 42.31% respondents from different faculties of Kherson State University. Among the additional organizational factors, first of all, it is worth paying attention to the involvement of moving games (21.26%), competitions (16.80%) and physical culture and sports holidays (15.59% of respondents, respectively).
Publisher
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University
Reference19 articles.
1. 1. Bohuslavska VYu. The content of theoretical training of athletes in swimming. Fizichna kultura, sport ta zdorov'ya natsiyi. 2016;2:119-123. Ukrainian
2. 2. Hlazirin ID. Swimming: Navchalniy posibnik. K.: Kodor; 2006. 502 p. Ukrainian
3. 3. Hriban HP. Swimming. Applied aspects. Navch.-metod.posib. Zhitomir: Ruta; 2009. 157 p. Ukrainian
4. 4. Platonov VN, editor. Sports swimming: the path to success. Kiev: Olympic literature;2012. Kn.2. 544 p. Russian
5. 5. Sedlyar YuV. Coordination of movements with arms and legs when swimming with a crawl. V: Osnovi pobudovi trenuvalnoho protsesu v tsiklichnikh vidakh sportu: Zb. nauk. prats: III Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. internet-konf. [Internet]; Kharkiv: KhDAFK; 2016;50-52. Available from: http://journals.uran.ua/cvs_konf/article/view/66440/0 Russian
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献