Affiliation:
1. State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
2. Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education Institute of Ecology College of Urban and Environmental Sciences Peking University Beijing China
3. College of Life Sciences Hebei University Baoding China
4. China National Botanical Garden Beijing China
5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
6. State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology Institute of Earth Environment Chinese Academy of Sciences Xi'an China
Abstract
AbstractRecent studies have highlighted the crucial role of abiotic processes, such as photodegradation and microclimatic fluctuation, in accelerating dryland litter decomposition. In grasslands, substantial amounts of dead plant material persist upright above the soil surface after senescence, experiencing distinct microclimatic conditions compared to surface litter. However, our understanding of how ultraviolet (UV) exposure and microclimatic conditions influence their decomposition is limited. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a field experiment manipulating UV radiation for both soil surface litter and standing litter and monitored their microclimatic conditions in a semi‐arid grassland. Our findings indicate that UV exposure enhanced the decomposition of soil surface litter by alleviating the constraint of lignin on litter decomposition, while having no significant influence on standing litter. Although the mean levels of thermal‐hydric conditions were lower, more intense fluctuation of temperature and air humidity was detected in standing litter. These higher‐level microclimatic fluctuations facilitated the release of dissolved organic carbon, potentially increasing the availability of labile substrates to microbes. Meanwhile, standing litter released more photo‐sensitive phenols, leading to decreased sensitivity to UV exposure. Consequently, while UV exposure initially increased standing litter decomposition during the early stage, its influence eventually diminished. These findings underscore the critical yet differing roles of microclimatic conditions and UV exposure in the decomposition of standing and surface litter. Relying solely on knowledges derived from surface litter decomposition and microclimate conditions may not accurately capture the patterns of grassland litter degradation.
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)