Affiliation:
1. Frontier Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System (FDOMES) Physical Oceanography Laboratory Ocean University of China Qingdao China
2. Sanya Oceanographic Institution Ocean University of China Sanya China
3. Laoshan Laboratory Qingdao China
Abstract
AbstractThe Gregg‐Henyey‐Polzin (GHP) finescale parameterization is widely employed to infer turbulent mixing when microstructure measurements are unavailable. However, the strain‐only GHP scaling is the only option when shear information is lacking, in which case the shear‐to‐strain ratio (Rω) is commonly treated as a constant. Since Rω has been reported to vary spatiotemporally, using a fixed value of Rω might result in a significant bias in inferring turbulent mixing. In this study, we present a global map of Rω, based on the microstructure database contributed by the Climate Process Team on internal wave‐driven ocean mixing, which covers the Indian, Pacific, and Atlantic oceans across both high and low latitudes. Then, we propose a parameterization of Rω by considering buoyancy frequency, Coriolis frequency, and topographic features. Compared to the GHP scaling with constant Rω, the turbulent dissipation rate values inferred from the GHP scaling with parameterized Rω are more accurate. In this manner, this study provides a reference for choosing optimal Rω when using the strain‐only GHP scaling to explore turbulent mixing in the open ocean.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Reference82 articles.
1. Lee waves in stratified flows with simple harmonic time dependence
2. Topographically generated internal waves in the open ocean
3. Internal wave observations from a midwater float, 2
4. Carter G. S.(2010).Microstructure data from Cruise 325020101123 (netcdf4 version) [Dataset].CCHDO.https://cchdo.ucsd.edu/cruise/325020101123
5. Carter G. S.(2011a).Microstructure data from Cruise 33KB20110115 (netcdf4 version) [Dataset].CCHDO.https://cchdo.ucsd.edu/cruise/33KB20110115