The Anthropocene Is More Than a Time Interval

Author:

Edgeworth Matthew1ORCID,Bauer Andrew M.2,Ellis Erle C.3ORCID,Finney Stanley C.4ORCID,Gill Jacqueline L.5ORCID,Gibbard Philip L.6ORCID,Maslin Mark78,Merritts Dorothy J.9ORCID,Walker Michael J. C.1011ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester Leicester UK

2. Department of Anthropology Stanford University Stanford CA USA

3. Department of Geography and Environmental Systems University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) Baltimore MD USA

4. Department of Geological Sciences California State University at Long Beach Long Beach CA USA

5. Climate Change Institute and School of Biology and Ecology University of Maine Orono ME USA

6. Scott Polar Research Institute University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

7. Department of Geography University College London London UK

8. Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

9. Department of Earth and Environment Franklin and Marshall College Lancaster PA USA

10. Department of Geography and Earth Sciences Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth UK

11. Faculty of Humanities and Performing Arts University of Wales Trinity Saint David Lampeter UK

Abstract

AbstractFollowing the recent rejection of a formal Anthropocene series/epoch by the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS) of the International Commission on Stratigraphy (ICS), and its subsequent confirmation by the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS), the opportunity arises to reset the definition of the Anthropocene. The case for informally recognizing the Anthropocene to be a major planetary event of Earth system transformation offers a promising way forward, but this has been criticized by proponents of an Anthropocene series/epoch. In order to move on from the assumption that it must be a time interval, and to foster a more transdisciplinary and inclusive approach, the main points of the critique must be directly addressed.

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3