Question Tree Technique in Science Education; Sample Application

Author:

Gülen Salih1,Yadigar Tuğba2

Affiliation:

1. MUŞ ALPARSLAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the question tree technique used in the science lesson and the questions brought independently by the students on academic success. In addition, it is to get the opinions of the students about the use of question tree. Mixed method was used in the study. In the study lasting eight weeks, 61 participants participated with random sampling method. A fully structured interview form was preferred in the collection of qualitative data. Question tree questions and academic achievement test were used to collect quantitative data. The data obtained from the measurement tools were analyzed descriptively and content. In these analyzes, assistance was taken from Microsoft Excel and SPSS 17 programs. T-Test, ANCOVA, frequency and percentage and participant citations were used to interpret the data. According to the findings; It was determined that the question tree technique did not make a significant difference on the academic achievement of the experimental and control groups. The test of question tree questions did not affect academic success. It is thought that bringing the questions out of the book, freeing them not under the control of the teacher and using the low level questions are effective on this result. Students' question tree; It has been determined that they are useful and entertaining, sharing the questions with the class and solving them together, and using them in learning the subjects they cannot understand. It has been determined that the questions put on the question tree of the students have effects such as giving them information, learning new and different questions and solutions. In line with the results, suggestions are presented.

Publisher

Ataturk Universitesi

Reference50 articles.

1. Aguiar, O. G, Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2009). Learning from and responding to students' questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20315

2. Allison, A. W., & Shrigley, R. L. (1986). Teaching children to ask operational questions in science. Science Education, 70(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730700109

3. Arık, S., & Yılmaz, M. (2017). Attitudes of science teachers towards environmental problems and their metaphorical perceptions for environmental pollution. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(3), 1147-1164.

4. Aslan, C. (2011). Effects of teaching applications for developing question asking skills on question forming skills of prospective teachers. Education and Science, 36(160), 236-249

5. Bahtiyar, A. (2019). Examining Socratic questioning levels of students in science and art centers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Pamukkale University Institute of Educational Sciences, Denizli

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3