ANOPLASTY AND LATERAL INTERNAL SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR CHRONIC ANAL FISSURE (systematic review and meta-analysis)

Author:

Arslanbekova K. I.1ORCID,Khryukin R. Yu.1ORCID,Zharkov E. E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is considered the ‘gold standard’ therapy for chronic anal fissure (CAF).  Advantages of LIS over other surgical techniques include higher rate of healing and lower risk of fissure recurrence. However, this procedure is associated with a high risk of anal sphincter insufficiency (ASI) in the postoperative period. Anal advancement flap (AAF) is an alternative surgical procedure for CAF, which requires the use of local flaps. Anal advancement flap is associated with a significantly lower risk of anal incontinence.AIM: to compare short-term and long-term outcomes of аnal advancement flap and lateral internal sphincterotomy in patients with chronic anal fissure.METHODS: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes of Anal advancement flap and lateral internal sphincterotomy was conducted. We evaluated the following parameters: the rate of epithelialization, the rate of anal sphincter insufficiency, and the rate of postoperative complications. We carried out statistical analysis using the Review Manager software (Review Manager 5.3.)RESULTS: the systematic review included four studies that presented the results of 278 patients. Compared with LIS, the odds for healing after AAF were 63% lower (OR=0.37; CI=0.19;0.74; P<0.005). We found no significant differences in the rate of postoperative complications (OR=1.43; CI=0.54;3.78; P=0,47). Compared with AAF, the odds for anal incontinence after LIS were 94% greater (OR=0.06; CI=0.01;0.37; P=0,002).CONCLUSION: both lateral internal sphincterotomy and аnal advancement flap are effective in curing CAF. However, considering the ambiguity and poor quality of data from the studies comparing these procedures, a high risk of bias for comparison groups and heterogeneity of the studies, one should interpret the results with caution; the aforementioned limitations dictate the need for further research.

Publisher

Russian Association of Coloproctology

Subject

Materials Chemistry

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3