Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion

Author:

Subramaniyan Manivannan12ORCID,Ecker Alexander S.1345ORCID,Patel Saumil S.1,Cotton R. James1,Bethge Matthias3465,Pitkow Xaq157,Berens Philipp13485,Tolias Andreas S.1457

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

2. Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

3. Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

4. Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

5. Center for Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

6. Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany

7. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas

8. Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Abstract

When the brain has determined the position of a moving object, because of anatomical and processing delays the object will have already moved to a new location. Given the statistical regularities present in natural motion, the brain may have acquired compensatory mechanisms to minimize the mismatch between the perceived and real positions of moving objects. A well-known visual illusion—the flash lag effect—points toward such a possibility. Although many psychophysical models have been suggested to explain this illusion, their predictions have not been tested at the neural level, particularly in a species of animal known to perceive the illusion. To this end, we recorded neural responses to flashed and moving bars from primary visual cortex (V1) of awake, fixating macaque monkeys. We found that the response latency to moving bars of varying speed, motion direction, and luminance was shorter than that to flashes, in a manner that is consistent with psychophysical results. At the level of V1, our results support the differential latency model positing that flashed and moving bars have different latencies. As we found a neural correlate of the illusion in passively fixating monkeys, our results also suggest that judging the instantaneous position of the moving bar at the time of flash—as required by the postdiction/motion-biasing model—may not be necessary for observing a neural correlate of the illusion. Our results also suggest that the brain may have evolved mechanisms to process moving stimuli faster and closer to real time compared with briefly appearing stationary stimuli.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We report several observations in awake macaque V1 that provide support for the differential latency model of the flash lag illusion. We find that the equal latency of flash and moving stimuli as assumed by motion integration/postdiction models does not hold in V1. We show that in macaque V1, motion processing latency depends on stimulus luminance, speed and motion direction in a manner consistent with several psychophysical properties of the flash lag illusion.

Funder

HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen

German Excellency Initiative through the Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Tubingen.

Bernstein award for computational neuroscience

Heisenberg Professorship

German Research Foundation (DFG) grant

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology,General Neuroscience

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3