Comparison of three strong ion models used for quantifying the acid-base status of human plasma with special emphasis on the plasma weak acids

Author:

Anstey Chris M.

Abstract

Currently, three strong ion models exist for the determination of plasma pH. Mathematically, they vary in their treatment of weak acids, and this study was designed to determine whether any significant differences exist in the simulated performance of these models. The models were subjected to a “metabolic” stress either in the form of variable strong ion difference and fixed weak acid effect, or vice versa, and compared over the range 25 ≤ Pco2≤ 135 Torr. The predictive equations for each model were iteratively solved for pH at each Pco2step, and the results were plotted as a series of log(Pco2)-pH titration curves. The results were analyzed for linearity by using ordinary least squares regression and for collinearity by using correlation. In every case, the results revealed a linear relationship between log(Pco2) and pH over the range 6.8 ≤ pH ≤ 7.8, and no significant difference between the curve predictions under metabolic stress. The curves were statistically collinear. Ultimately, their clinical utility will be determined both by acceptance of the strong ion framework for describing acid-base physiology and by the ease of measurement of the independent model parameters.

Publisher

American Physiological Society

Subject

Physiology (medical),Physiology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A mechanistic physicochemical model of carbon dioxide transport in blood;Journal of Applied Physiology;2017-02-01

2. Acid–base balance and disorders;Oh's Intensive Care Manual;2014

3. Praktische Diagnostik des Säure-Base-Haushalts;Weiterbildung Anästhesiologie;2013

4. Praktische Diagnostik des Säure-Base-Haushalts;Der Anaesthesist;2012-12

5. A critique of Stewart’s approach: the chemical mechanism of dilutional acidosis;Applied Physiology in Intensive Care Medicine 1;2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3