Calculated PRA and PIRCHE Algorithm in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Author:

Ivana Dedinska12,Andrej Ceres3,Martina Schniederova3,Karol Granak12,Matej Vnucak12,Monika Beliancinova12,Patricia Kleinova12,Timea Blichova12,Milos Jesenak3

Affiliation:

1. Transplant-Nephrology Department , University Hospital Martin , Slovakia

2. Clinic of Internal Medicine I ., University Hospital Martin and Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava , Martin , Slovakia

3. Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology , University Hospital Martin and Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava , Martin , Slovakia

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Calculated PRA testing in kidney transplantation has revolutionized the field by enabling a more accurate assessment of compatibility and risk prediction for AMR. On the other hand, The PIRCHE algorithm aims to identify the potentially immunogenic human leukocyte antigens (HLA) epitopes on the donor graft that are recognized by the recipient's HLA antibodies. The aim of this analysis was to compare the actual immunological risk at the time of transplantation with the hypothetical risk that would be determined by cPRA and PIRCHE. Another aim was to compare this hypothetical risk also in the context of the development of DSA and the protocol graft biopsy at month 3. Material and methods In a group of 20 patients we recorded the real immunological risk determined at the time of transplantation according to the induction immunosuppression protocol of the Transplant-Nephrology Department of the University Hospital Martin and compared it with the hypothetical calculated risk according to cPRA and PIRCHE. We then compared the hypothetical risk with the protocol biopsy result and with any evidence of donor-specific antibodies at month 3 after the kidney transplantation. Results Under cPRA, the two patients we assessed as medium risk in real time would be classified as low risk. Both of these patients did not have DSA identified at month 3 and did not have rejection changes in the protocol biopsy. According to PIRCHE, the immunological risk would change from moderate to low in two patients, and even from very high to low in one patient. In none of these patients did we subsequently observe DSA formation at month 3 post-transplantation, and also all three protocol biopsies were free of rejection changes in these patients. Conclusion In our analysis we confirmed the importance of both immunological and non-immunological parameters for determining risk at the time of transplantation. For using PIRCHE score larger studies are required to confirm this strategy.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3