Affiliation:
1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre , Bydgoszcz , Poland
2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Military Institute of Medicine , Warsaw , Poland
3. Department of Positron Emission Tomography and Molecular Diagnostics, Collegium Medicum of Nicolaus Copernicus University , Bydgoszcz , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Detectable uptake of 68Ga-PSMA-ligands in sympathetic ganglia may potentially lead to mistaking them for malignant lesions. Our aim was to investigate the anatomy of cervico-thoracic-ganglia-complex (CTG-C) in the MR part of multimodal 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR imaging, in view of PET factors hindering its proper identification.
Patients and methods
In 106 patients, 212 sites of the CTG-C were retrospectively reviewed to assess the radiotracer uptake (SUVmax), size, shape, position, symmetry of location and visual uptake intensity. Asymmetry of PSMA-ligand uptake and increased uptake were regarded as risk factors of malignancy.
Results
In 66.0% left (L) and 53.8% right (R) CTG-C we noticed configurations, resembling the shape of an exclamation-mark, a question-mark, or its part (called “typical”). Tumor-like CTG-C shapes (oval, binodular or longitudinal) were detected in 28.3% L-CTG-C and in 40.6% R-CTG-C. When visual assessment of PET suggested malignancy, the recognition of “typical” shape of underlying CTG-C on MR generated a rise in the accuracy of their proper identification (from 34.4% to 75%, χ2(1) = 70.4; p < 0.001). Recognizing the shape of the CTG-C as “typical” in MR allowed us to classify as “not-suspicious” 61.9% of all CTG-C which were treated as “suspicious” after sole PET assessment.
Conclusions
The characteristic shape of cervico-thoracic-ganglia-complex (resembling a question-mark, or its part) helps in proper recognition of CTG-C on multimodal whole-body 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/MR imaging, when detectable uptake might lead to considering pathology.
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology
Reference23 articles.
1. Raveendran VL, Kamalamma GK. Inferior cervical ganglion and stellate ganglion- concepts revisited. J Evolution Med Dent Sci 2018; 7: 1653-8. doi: 10.14260/jemds/2018/373
2. Jamieson DW, Smith DB, Anson JB. The cervical sympathetic ganglia: an anatomical study of 100 cervicothoracic dissections. Q Bull Northwest Univ Med Sch 1952; 26: 219-27. PMID: 14957979
3. Perlow S, Vehe KL. Variations in the gross anatomy of the stellate and lumbar sympathetic ganglia. Am J Surg 1935; 30: 454-8
4. Hoffman HH. An analysis of the sympathetic trunk and rami in the cervical and upper thoracic regions in man. Ann Surg 1957; 145: 94-103. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195701000-00010
5. Kwon OJ, Pendekanti S, Fox JN, Yanagawa J, Fishbein MC, Shivkumar K, et al. Morphological spectra of adult human stellate ganglia: Implications for thoracic sympathetic denervation. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2018; 301: 1244-50. doi: 10.1002/ar.23797