Affiliation:
1. Centre Maurice Halbwachs (CNRS/EHESS/ENS) , F- 75014 Paris
2. Université de Neuchâtel , Institut de sociologie , CH- 2000 Neuchâtel
Abstract
Abstract
By extending the analytical perspective of Durkheim, we set a theoretical framework to examine social bonds at two levels: the attachment of individuals to each other and the attachment of individuals to society. We create statistical indicators for comparing European countries and also, on an exploratory basis, the regions of Switzerland. We can distinguish and validate four ideal types of attachment regimes (familialist, voluntarist, organicist and universalist). Furthermore, our analysis shows national and regional specificities.
Reference51 articles.
1. Armingeon, Klaus et Michelle Beyeler. 2004. Little Contention: Switzerland and the OECD. Pp. 139–152 in The OECD and European Welfare States, édité par Klaus Armingeon et Michelle Beyeler. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
2. Bambra, Clare. 2006. Decommodification and the Worlds of Welfare Revisited. Journal of European Social Policy 16(1) : 73–80.
3. Banfield, Edward C. 1958. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Glencoe, IL : The Free Press.
4. Bonoli, Giuliano. 2004. L’État social suisse en comparaison : la fin d’un «Sonderfall» ? Pp. 150–168 in Rapport social 2004, édité par Christian Suter, Isabelle Renschler et Dominique Joye. Zurich: Seismo
5. Bonoli, Giuliano et Silja Häusermann. 2011. Swiss Welfare Reforms in a Comparative European Perspective: Between Retrenchment and Activation. Pp. 186–204 in Switzerland in Europe: Continuity and Change in the Swiss Political Economy, édité par Christine Trampusch et André Mach. London : Routledge.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Social Attachment;Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research;2023
2. Social Attachment;Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research;2022