Author:
Krämer Hagen,Weizsäcker Carl Christian von
Abstract
Abstract
Some analyses examining the long-term sustainability of government debt use the term implicit government debt. This is an approach that is occasionally criticized. However, the concept of implicit government debt is necessary to evaluate the scope for long-term fiscal policy and to analyze the consequences of demographic change. Krämer and von Weizsäcker reject the assumption of a general positive interest rate-growth differential that is often made in these sustainability analyses. Priewe focuses on the controversy surrounding implicit government debt and explains a theory of interest rates that differs from Krämer and Weizsäcker but leads to similar results.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference17 articles.
1. Albers, T. N. H., C. Bartels und M. Schularick (2022), Wealth and its Distribution in Germany, 1895-2018, CESifo Working Paper, 9739.
2. Barr, N. und P. Diamond (2006), The Economics of Pensions, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1), 15-39.
3. Barr, N. und P. Diamond (2010), Pension Reform: A Short Guide. Oxford University Press.
4. BIB – Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (2022), Pressemitteilung vom 11. Juli.
5. BMF – Bundesministerium der Finanzen (2020), Fünfter Tragfähigkeitsbericht.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献