Affiliation:
1. University Clinic of Clinical Biochemistry – Skopje , Macedonia
2. Department of General Medicine and Clinical Laboratory , Medical University – Varna , Bulgaria
3. Institute of Medical &Experimental Biochemistry, Medical Faculty – Skopje , Macedonia
Abstract
Abstract
Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL), urinary N-acetyl-bd-glucosaminidase (NAG), urinary α1-microglobulin/creatinine ratio and cystatin C have been suggested as potential early markers of delayed graft function (DGF) following kidney transplantation. We conducted a prospective study in 50 consecutive kidney transplant recipients to evaluate serial changes of these biomarkers within the first week after transplantation and assess their performance in predicting DGF (dialysis requirement during initial post-transplant week) and graft function throughout the first year. Urine samples were collected on post-transplantation days 0, 1, 2, 4, and 7. Statistical analysis: Linear mixed and multivariable regression models, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC), and areas under ROC curves were used. At all-time points, mean urinary NGAL levels were significantly higher in patients developing DGF. Shortly after transplantation (3-6 h), uNGAL and uNAG values were higher in DGF recipients (on average +242 ng/mL; NAG – 6.8 U/mmol creatinine, considering mean dialysis time of 4.1 years) and rose further in the following days, contrasting with prompt function recipients. On Day-1 uNGAL levels accurately predicted DGF (AUC-ROC = 0.93), with a performance higher than serum creatinine (AUC-ROC = 0.76), and similar to cystatin C (AUC-ROC = 0.95). Multivariable analyses revealed that uNGAL levels at days 4 and 7 were strongly associated with one-year serum creatinine level. Urinary NGAL, serum cystatin C is an early marker of graft injury and is independently associated with dialysis requirement within one week after transplantation and one-year graft function.
Reference40 articles.
1. 1. Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, Remuzzi G. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet, 2004, 364, No. 9447, 1814-1827.10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17406-0
2. 2. Ojo AO, Wolfe RA, Held PJ et al. Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival. Transplantation, 1997, 63, No. 7, 968-974.10.1097/00007890-199704150-00011
3. 3. Koning OHJ, van Bockel JH, van der Woude FJ et al. Risk factors for delayed graft function in University of Wisconsin solution preserved kidneys from multiorgan donors. Transplantation Proceedings, 1995, 27, No.1, 752-753.
4. 4. Sellers MT, Gallichio MH, Hudson SL et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clinical Transplantation, 2000, 14, No. 6, 543-549.10.1034/j.1399-0012.2000.140605.x
5. 5. Gjertson DW. Impact of delayed graft function and acute rejection on kidney graft survival. Clinical Transplants, 2000, 467-480.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献