Affiliation:
1. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service , Lubbock , TX
2. Texas A&M AgriLife Research , Lubbock , TX
3. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service , Lubbock , TX , currently at United States Department of Agriculture , 1400 Independence Ave SW , Washington , DC
Abstract
Abstract
A three-year rotation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars either resistant (R) or susceptible (S) to Rotylenchulus reniformis and fallow (F) was examined for effect on cotton yield and nematode density. In year 1, 2, and 3, the resistant cultivar (DP 2143NR B3XF) yielded 78, 77, and 113% higher than the susceptible cultivar (DP 2044 B3XF). Fallow in year 1 followed by S in year 2 (F1S2) improved yield in year 2 by 24% compared with S1S2, but not as much as R1S2 (41% yield increase over S1S2). One year of fallow followed by R (F1R2) had lower yield in year 2 (11% reduction) than R1R2. The highest yield after three years of these rotations occurred with R1R2R3, followed by R1S2R3 (17% less yield) and F1F2S3 (35% less yield). Rotylenchulus reniformis density in soil averaged 57, 65, and 70% lower (year 1, 2, 3, respectively) in R1R2R3 compared with S1S2S3. In years 1 and 2, LOG10 transformed nematode density (LREN) was lower in F1, and F1F2, than for all other combinations. In year 3, the lowest LREN were associated with R1R2R3, F1S2F3, and F1F2S3. The highest LREN were associated with F1R2S3, F1S2S3, S1S2S3, R1R2S3, and R1S2S3. The combination of higher yield and lower nematode density will be a strong incentive for producers to use the R. reniformis resistant cultivars continuously.
Reference27 articles.
1. Caswell, E. P., DeFrank, K. J., Apt, W. J., and Tang, C. S. 1991. Influence of nonhost plants on population decline of Rotylenchulus reniformis. Journal of Nematology 23:91–98.
2. Cotton Division. 1993. The classification of cotton. Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA Agricultural Handbook 566, 32.
3. Davis, R. F., Koenning, S. R., Kemerait, R. C., Cummings, T. D., and Shurley, W. D. 2003. Rotylenchulus reniformis management in cotton with crop rotation. Journal of Nematology 35:58–64.
4. Dyer, D. R., Groover, W., Lawrence, K. S. 2020. Yield loss of cotton cultivars due to Rotylenchulus reniformis and the added benefit of a nematicide. Plant Health Progress 21:113–118.
5. Gaudin, A. G., and Wubben, M. J. 2021. Genotypic and phenotypic evaluation of wild cotton accessions previously identified as resistant to root-knot (Meloidogyne incognita) or reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis). Euphytica 217:207.