Author:
Giuffrè O.,Granà A.,Giuffrè T.,Marino R.,Marino S.
Abstract
AbstractIn the paper, a choice criterion between flower roundabouts and double-lane roundabouts is proposed, focusing on operational benefits that can derive from one scheme over the other, and outlining a general framework for benefit-cost analysis. In order to assess operational benefits of innovative roundabouts over modern roundabouts, a comparative analysis was made. Capacity was estimated using gap-acceptance models. In detail, assuming the dichotomic shifted negative exponential distribution to model headways in circulating streams, the Hagring formula was adjusted to obtain entry capacity estimations at roundabout approaches where entering vehicles face one or two conflicting flows. Based on the control delay, the suitability domains and indifference areas were constructed. Thus, a sensitivity analysis to changes in traffic demand for operational benefits of flower roundabouts over double-lane roundabouts was carried out and discussed. At last, evidence for new installations and conversion of existing roundabouts can be found.
Subject
Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference22 articles.
1. Comparing Performances of Turbo - roundabouts and Double - lane Roundabouts;Giuffrè;Modern Applied Science,2012
2. Roundabouts The state of the art in German ITE;Brilon;Journal,1998
3. Capacity of Large Dual and Triple - Lanes Roundabouts During Heavy Demand Conditions for and;Madani;Arabian Journal Science Engineering,2013
4. Turbo roundabouts Estimation of capacity;Fortuijn;Transportation Research Record,2009
5. How to derive the analytical capacity model for not - conventional urban roundabouts on the Built Environment;Giuffrè;WIT Transactions,2008
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献