Research on the Development of New Sensors and Sensor Detection Technology in the Context of Big Data
Affiliation:
1. China Institute of Disaster Prevention , Sanhe , Hebei , , China . 2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Seismic Disaster Instrument and Monitoring Technology , Sanhe , Hebei , , China . 3. Langfang Key Laboratory of Accurately-Controlled Active Seismic Source , Sanhe , Hebei , , China .
Abstract
Abstract
In the context of big data, traditional detection algorithms can no longer meet today’s needs. For traditional sensors, there are shortcomings such as long working times, high complexity, and high false detection rates. This paper proposes a new type of sensor and an algorithm for detecting anomalies in sensors based on Flink. The sensor network senses the monitoring targets in the monitoring area in real time and transmits them to the end users through wireless communication. Then, the fusion rule for target detection in sensor networks is studied. Then, the detection algorithm is computed using Flink and predicted using a sliding window and ARIMA model on the Flink platform. Then, the confidence intervals of the prediction results are calculated, and the outliers are evaluated. Finally, the K-Means++ algorithm is used for clustering and probability assessment of previously obtained outliers. Then, compared with traditional sensors, comparative analysis shows that the proposed method in this paper has some advantages in terms of both sensitivity (S) and quality factor (Q). The value of S is more than 320 than the 2D PhC sensor array. The value of Q is more than 5295 than the 2D PhC sensor array. This paper’s new sensor detection method is more diverse than the traditional method. The detection time is reduced. The detection accuracy is also improved compared to the traditional method. It can be summarized by comparison that the new sensor in this paper is more excellent than the traditional method of detection.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference25 articles.
1. Zhu, L., Suomalainen, J., Liu, J., Hyyppä, J., Kaartinen, H., & Haggren, H. (2018). A review: Remote sensing sensors. Multi-purposeful application of geospatial data, 19. 2. Morawska, L., Thai, P. K., Liu, X., Asumadu-Sakyi, A., Ayoko, G., Bartonova, A., ... & Williams, R. (2018). Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone?. Environment international, 116, 286-299. 3. Amanzadeh, M., Aminossadati, S. M., Kizil, M. S., & Rakić, A. D. (2018). Recent developments in fibre optic shape sensing. Measurement, 128, 119-137. 4. Albahri, O. S., Albahri, A. S., Mohammed, K. I., Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Hashim, M., & Salman, O. H. (2018). Systematic review of real-time remote health monitoring system in triage and priority-based sensor technology: Taxonomy, open challenges, motivation and recommendations. Journal of medical systems, 42, 1-27. 5. West, H., Quinn, N., & Horswell, M. (2019). Remote sensing for drought monitoring & impact assessment: Progress, past challenges and future opportunities. Remote Sensing of Environment, 232, 111291.
|
|