Affiliation:
1. Regina Maria Hospital , Cluj-Napoca , Romania
2. Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Emergency Clinical County Hospital , Cluj-Napoca , Romania
3. Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Regina Maria Hospital , Cluj-Napoca , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Controlled anticoagulation is key to maintaining continuous blood filtration therapies. Objective: The study aimed to compare different blood sampling sites for activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) to evaluate anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and identify the most appropriate sampling site for safe patient anticoagulation and increased filter life span.
Method
The study was a prospective observational single-centre investigation targeting intensive care unit (ICU) patients on CRRT using an anticoagulation protocol based on patient characteristics and a weight-based modified nomogram. Eighty-four patients were included in the study. Four sampling sites were assessed: heparin free central venous nondialysis catheter (CVC), an arterial line with heparinised flush (Artery), a circuit access line (Access), and a circuit return line (Postfilter). Blood was sampled from each of four different sites on every patient, four hours after the first heparin bolus. aPTT was determined using a rapid clot detector, point of care device.
Results
A high positive correlation was obtained for aPTT values between CVC and Access sampling sites (r (84) =0.72; p <0 .05) and a low positive correlation between CVC and Arterial sampling site (r (84) =0.46, p < 0.05). When correlated by artery age, the young Artery (1-3 day old) correlates with CVC, Access and Postfilter (r (45) = 0.74, p >0.05). The aPTT values were significantly higher at Postfilter and Arterial sampling site, older than three days, compared to the CVC sampling site (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Considering patient bleeding risks and filter life span, the optimal sampling sites for safe assessment of unfractionated heparin anticoagulation on CRRT during CVVHDF were the central venous catheter using heparin free lavage saline solution, a heparinised flushed arterial catheter not older than three days, and a circuit access line.
Reference29 articles.
1. Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA 2005;294:813-8.
2. Violo L, De Francesco M. Timing of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:289-90.
3. Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120:179-84.
4. Fealy N, Aitken L, Toit Ed, Baldwin I Continuous renal replacement therapy: current practice in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units.Crit Care Resusc. 2015; 17:83-91.
5. Gould D, Doidge J, Sadique M et al. Renal replacement anticoagulant management: Protocol and analysis plan for an observational comparative effectiveness study of linked data sources. Journal of the Intensive Care Society 2020 10.1177/1751143720913417
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献